this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
130 points (98.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43746 readers
1277 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I get that, but it's kinda the same as saying "I dare you!" ; "I dare you to infinity!" ; "nuh uh, I dare you to double infinity!"

Sure it's more theoretically, but not really functionally more.

[โ€“] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's like when you say something is full. Double full doesn't mean anything, but there's still a difference between full of marbles and full of sand depending what you're trying to deduce. There's functional applications for this comparison. We could theoretically say there's twice as much sand than marbles in "full" if were interested in "counting".

The same way we have this idea of full, we have the idea of infinity which can affect certain mathematics. Full doesn't tell you the size of the container, it's a concept. A bucket twice as large is still full, so there are different kinds of full like we have different kinds of infinity.

[โ€“] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

When talking about infinity, basically everything is theoretical

[โ€“] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

but not really functionally more.

Please show me a functional infinity

[โ€“] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right, an asymptote I guess, in use, but not a number.

[โ€“] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

It's been quite some time since I did pre-calc, but I remember there being equations where it was relevant that one infinity was bigger than another.