this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
120 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

1377 readers
239 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Prime minister wants young people to be shielded from ‘power of the algorithm’

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ballissle@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I was jailbreaking my iPod when I was 11 and bypassing school computer restrictions. This isn't stopping anyone. I think even a vpn would simply bypass this

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 weeks ago

I am less concerned with stopping young people from accessing the web then with general awareness of people about the damaging mental side effects of technology.

Those side effects are usually long term, an account and a few online interactions wont harm much. But a habit will.

If my kids hacks trough my infrastructure i will shine with IT pride… and then update my infrastructure explaining them why it is i am so concerned.

I know they will find ways outside my walled garden but keeping them in was never the point, providing a safe space to live to develop healthy habits is.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

I tormented the crap out of my middle schools IT guy. He couldn't figure out how I managed to bypass the GPOs. Spoiler: the group policy was at the user level which made it easy to unapply.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

They may require real-world credentials for account creation to prevent that from happening.

She said the government was investigating methods of enforcing such restrictions that did not intervene with human rights, such as the requirement for a bank account.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It also gives parents assurance that they arent crazy for wanting to limit their kids access to these hell sites.

[–] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

These parents should realize that they might run into it.

In a couple (maybe most at this point idk) EU countries you can use your ID in combination with your phones NFC and an open source app to prove certain parameters like age to sites, without giving up any identifying information. This is what should be used here and not fucking bank accounts.