Those are reasonable statements, but it doesn't explain why the digital equivalents cost MORE than their physical counterparts. Especially considering there's no manufacturing, distribution, shipping, storage, etc.. Sure, servers and bandwidth cost money, but nowhere near what an entire physical distribution chain costs. It's pennies on the dollar.

[–] ShawiniganHandshake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can't think of a recent time where I've seen an eBook that cost more than the paperback but I haven't been looking specifically. In my experience, the eBook is usually a buck or two cheaper than the print version.

I'm open to being wrong about this.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

All the books I've seen in Amazon are like this

I don't buy at Amazon, usually when I do is Google or Kobo, and the prices are similar to Amazons sometimes slightly cheaper.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Especially since the marginal cost of information goods is zero

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 20 hours ago

That assumes the work of creating or collating the information has been fully amortized. The cost of information should tend toward zero, but it should start high enough to fairly reward its creators and those who made it visible