this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
-16 points (28.9% liked)
Progressive Politics
1073 readers
169 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What?
Support for a total ban keeps waffling and has for years. It literally just flipped from majority ban to majority keep in jist the last two weeks. If polled today it could be either.
But regulation and a halt to expansion is minimally 70%, as high as 90% depending on how it's phrased.
Both trump and Biden deregulated and expanded. Kamala shows no sign of being different.
But my point is, as bad as Clinton was, wanting to ban fracking or not has a negligible effect on Pennsylvania.
Big effect nationally tho, would help elsewhere....
Then there's the whole thing about how fracking needs to be banned which I hope don't need explained.
Like, if the benefit of pissing off the base is negligible and it destroys the local environment and causes more damage than coal....
Why not ban it?
Too much of the PA economy is dependent on fracking. If she supported a ban, she'd lose PA.
And yet only 0.5% work in fossil fuels....
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/10/donald-trump-kamala-harris-pennsylvania-fracking-support-dimock-anger-water-wells-contamination/
Read the article, I think it will change your mind. And they present it better than I can.