1176
Trump Raged at Slain Soldier’s Funeral Bill: ‘$60K to Bury a F***ing Mexican’
(www.thedailybeast.com)
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
1176 points (97.7% liked)
News
23287 readers
3670 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes, but you wouldn't:
Any idiot could see that the funeral was going to get out of hand.
If Trump said he'd by me lunch it'd be the most expensive lunch in history.
If someone offers to pay your lunch, or in this case for the funeral of your murdered child, trying to make it 'the most expensive in history' to fully abuse that offer just makes you a Sad. person imo. Imagine having it done to you.
To reiterate: It'd make me happy Donnie almost dies in a fire but is kept in a conscious coma for hundreds of years
Well, I don't care at all if you think I'm sad, but you may have missed your point.
If my neighbour offered to buy me lunch I would politely insist on contributing in my own way. I don't really want people to buy things for me. That said, I dislike Trump immensely, he brags about his wealth, and if he offered to pay for something for me because the optics look good, I would absolutely abuse that offer. If it were for my daughters funeral presumably that would occupy my thoughts and I wouldn't politicise it by using my daughters funeral as a way to steal from trump, but there would be no fucks given about the cost.
My point is, "someone" offering to buy me lunch is not at all the same as Trump offering to buy me lunch while interviewing me on TV in the whitehouse because it makes him look good.
Sure, I can understand trying to find ways to 'get' Trump, but seeing something that is still somewhat of an act of generosity as an opportunity to scam someone...
Anyway a) he was probably never going to pay this out of his own personal pocket and b) this just resulted in this family to have to pay for their absurdly lavish funeral themselves
My point is that it wasnt an act of generosity.
He did it because it made him look good.
I know, it's like Oprah giving away cars. But still, takes a special person to see that as an opportunity to scam them
No, it really doesn't.
When someone brags about their wealth, and offers you free stuff without stipulation or limitation, the recipient is going to accept that offer. Any recipient.
It takes a special person to offer financial support to a grieving mother because it's looks great on television, and later withdraw that support.
Oh look at this terrible calamity that has befallen you, why don't you take this very nice thing that you can't afford to make you feel better wink, I'll surprise you with the bill for it once it's too late and you can manage the burden of crushing debt as well as your grief at the loss of your child.