this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
318 points (98.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26560 readers
1754 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't mean BETTER. That's a different conversation. I mean cooler.

An old CRT display was literally a small scale particle accelerator, firing angry electron beams at light speed towards the viewers, bent by an electromagnet that alternates at an ultra high frequency, stopped by a rounded rectangle of glowing phosphors.

If a CRT goes bad it can actually make people sick.

That's just. Conceptually a lot COOLER than a modern LED panel, which really is just a bajillion very tiny lightbulbs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

Used to be where Mongoose, Huffy, Schwinn, etc bearings and stuff were interchangeable. Used to be where NVidia GPUs could run in an AMD motherboard. I happen to own older things on both ends of that compatible spectrum.

Used to be where an Idle Air Control Valve from a Chevy would fit an Isuzu...

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 10 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Used to be where NVidia GPUs could run in an AMD motherboard.

They still can.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Oof, wait. I mean when AMD processors were actually compatible with nVidia motherboards.

A8N-SLI Deluxe

[–] autriyo@feddit.org 3 points 17 hours ago

But that's not a thing for intel CPUs either, at least not anymore.

I'm not sure why, but Nvidia hasn't been making chipsets/motherboard sfor quite a while. Or was there a point in time when it only made chipsets for intel CPUs?

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Probably not as well as used to be though.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Try an nVidia nForce4

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Used to be where NVidia GPUs could run in an AMD motherboard. I happen to own older things on both ends of that compatible spectrum.

I don't know what you mean by that. The protocol for communication of computer parts is open source. Desktop computers are a great example of interchangeable parts. An Nvidia GPU that can't run in an AMD motherboard is either not from the same era (so an equivalent AMD GPU wouldn't work either) or a different form factor (e.g. trying to plug a laptop GPU on a Desktop)

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world -2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

The protocol of communication of computer parts is open source? Since when?

What the fuck is USB? And why is that proprietary?

Regardless, AMD vs nVidia might work together, but not optimally these days.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Regardless, AMD vs nVidia might work together, but not optimally these days.

And yet most of the time in the past 2 year the best choice for a gaming PC would be a 3D cache Ryzen with an Nvidia GPU. Is there something particular you have in mind that supposedly doesn't work with an AMD chipset and an Nvidia GPU?

PCI-Express is not an open standard but both AMD and Nvidia are members and it's what both use for their GPUs and AMD for it's chipsets (as well as Intel). It's certainly not a secret cabal.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

This supports your claim of AMD vs Nvidia not working optimally together how?

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The protocol of communication of computer parts is open source? Since when?

Since forever, which protocol do you think it's not? For a few examples here's PCI and DDR5

What the fuck is USB? And why is that proprietary?

USB is a standardized connector, with again an open source protocol. Here's the specification in case you're interested https://www.usb.org/document-library/usb-20-specification

Regardless, AMD vs nVidia might work together, but not optimally these days.

I would need a source for that, I've had AMD +Nvidia up until very recently and it worked as expected.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world -2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

USB is absolutely not a standardized connector, otherwise it would only be one type of connector, not the dozen or so they've made over the decades. There's nothing universal about it.

And if it was open source, then why doesn't VirtualBox release the source code for their USB extension package?

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

USB is absolutely not a standardized connector,

USB is absolutely standardized, I even sent you the 2.0 spec, you can get the spec for the other versions on the same website.

otherwise it would only be one type of connector, not the dozen or so they've made over the decades.

Different versions/connectors have different specs, all of them open, otherwise different manufacturers wouldn't be able to create devices that use it.

There's nothing universal about it.

That's ridiculous, first of all the name relates to the fact that it can be used for any data transfer as long as it's serial. Secondly the sheer amount of different devices from different manufacturers that can be plugged via USB should give you a hint of just how universal and open the standard is.

And if it was open source, then why doesn't VirtualBox release the source code for their USB extension package?

The standard is open, implementations of it are not, it's like OpenGL or Vulkan.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

USB 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, 3.0, 3.1, A, B, C connectors, large and small.

Not even counting the various charging rates and voltages..

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Being able to build something with off the shelf parts is an art.