this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
282 points (99.0% liked)

HistoryPorn

4870 readers
261 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you think you can only have one alliance?

So you brought up the Tripartite Alliance in a discussion about Finland, contrasting the Tripartite Alliance with the accusation towards the Soviets having done the exact same thing as the Finns, in order to show...

... what, again?

The Tripartite Pact was an alliance, the black fascists agreed on mutual defense terms. Molotov-Ribbentrop was painting new lines on a map and agreeing on trade and, as mentioned, literally no credible experts view it otherwise.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You're the one who falsely claimed the Soviets and Axis had an alliance. I pointed to what actual alliances are, since you seemed to be confused by the idea.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What is it you would call coordinating military efforts against a common foe?

It would seem it has a different name when the Finns and the Nazis do it than when the Soviets and the Nazis do it.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We both know you're too smart to actually believe the situations are comparable.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You're absolutely right. The Soviets actively pursuing the destruction of a sovereign nation by cooperating with the literal fucking Nazis, in the interest of the Soviet Union's desire to quite literally genocide the Polish people, not unlike the Nazis, isn't really comparable to the Finns cooperating with the literal fucking Nazis to retake territory that was seized and ethnically cleansed from them.

The Finnish choice is unforgivable, but you're right, the Soviet choice was much worse. On account of being an active pursuit of genocide as well as an instrument to the Nazi genocide.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Soviet Russian chauvinism in the context of pan-Slavism was many things, but it wasn't genocidal towards Poles as an ethnicity. Murderous towards anyone that might be able to rally resistance, certainly, and it exploited ethnic divides in the time honored tradition of any colonizing power, but it wasn't anything like Generalplan Ost and you know it.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Russian chauvinism in the context of pan-Slavism was many things, but it wasn’t genocidal towards Poles as an ethnicity.

Oh yes, the Sovs just executed 100,000 Poles in the USSR in '38, and killed and deported another million and a half in Poland itself in 39-41 because they were uninterested in genocide. Brilliant. Just brilliant.

but it wasn’t anything like Generalplan Ost and you know it.

Oh, cool, the Holodomor wasn't anything like Generalplan Ost either, so I guess the Holodomor wasn't genocidal either.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, because the Holodomor and eradication of the Crimean Tartars were specific eradication campaigns unlike the Soviet mass executions in Poland, glad we cleared that up.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Would you like to elaborate how the Soviet mass executions and deportations in Poland were not eradication campaigns, but that the deportation of the Crimean Tatars and the Holodomor were eradication campaigns? Walk me through your criteria here. Is targeting a specific ethnicity for mass executions and deportation in the name of eradicating the nation not eradication in some way that I'm unaware of?

Walk me through how executing 5% of the Polish nation in your newly conquered territories and deporting another 25% inside of two years isn't genocide. Walk me through how targeting Poles specifically in the newly conquered territories, rather than other ethnicities living in what-was-previously-Poland, isn't an eradication campaign.

Please. Enlighten me.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because the ethnic cleansing of Poles as a cleansing mostly happened in Ukraine and Belarus? You know where they shipped most Ukrainian and Belarusian Poles to?

Poland!

There's obviously a lot to say about THAT in a Glorious Communist Utopia but it's pretty hard to argue Stalin was ethnically cleansing Poland of Poles when he was also shipping more ethnic Poles into Poland.

Now if you want to argue that Belarus was Polish territory before the Tsars conquered it there's at least a point there.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because the ethnic cleansing of Poles as a cleansing mostly happened in Ukraine and Belarus?

Are you taking the piss right now.

A million Poles are deported from Poland itself, some 150,000+ are outright executed, and you're saying that the Soviets were performing these atrocities on a larger scale in Ukraine and Belarus, when there weren't even a million Poles in the whole of the USSR.

Are you fucking stupid.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_exchange_between_Poland_and_Soviet_Ukraine

From your own source

The population exchange between Poland and Soviet Ukraine at the end of World War II was based on a treaty signed on 9 September 1944

1944

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Couldn't do it in 1941, now could they?

Don't forget the part where America and Britain agreed.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Couldn’t do it in 1941, now could they?

...

We're talking about a genocide that happened 1938-1941

Don’t forget the part where America and Britain agreed.

Yes, I remember when America and Britain said "Wow, you go Stalin, I love that you've expelled and exterminated over a quarter of the Polish nation in the land that was once Poland, a sovereign state that one of us was outright allied with!" in 1941.