this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
874 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59582 readers
4208 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reliv3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You are making such a useless point that requires minimal effort or thought. It would be better if you actually shared a tangible concern rather than providing a strawman argument meant to cause an irrational fear in people reading your comment.

For example, you could have shared which group of people you want to be a protected class and is not by Irish law; or which group of people is currently a protected class by Irish law and should not be. At least, then, you would have brought up a real concern about how the Irish government is determining hate speech; because right now, all you are doing is fear mongering.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I oppose letting anyone define hate speech as a matter of principle, because even if I agree with the definition completely now, I may not continue to agree with the definition in the future. Look at what has been happening in the USA since the October 7 attack: a lot of people I had considered my political allies turned out to have beliefs I consider to be hateful, and meanwhile these people consider my own beliefs hateful. The solution is not to empower a single central authority to decide which sort of hate is allowed. It is (as it has always been) to maintain the principle of free speech.

[–] wanderingmagus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

How about incitements to violence and outright explicit disinformation/misinformation, like:

  • [group] should be [violent act]
  • [group] are [dehumanizing pejorative] that deserve [violent act]
  • [dogwhistle for the actual Nazis, like the 14 words, terminology specifically referencing the Final Solution, etc]
  • [hard r] are [extreme dehumanizing pejorative] and don't deserve [human rights]
  • [violent or repulsive act] the [slur]
  • "Despite only making up 13%..."
  • "Whites create and forget, [slur]s copy and remember..."