this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
242 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59232 readers
3756 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meet the latest way the superrich prove they're really, totally worried about the environment: $10 million electric superyachts::Electric cars? The superrich have already moved on to electric yachts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No I think the issue is that electric boats will never do as much mileage as a car to offset the carbon in their production. And also that its still doing the exact same thing that is the problem: having massive industrial production for excess. Its entirely about image and pretending to care

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, I'm not sure I totally agree with this. Pretending to care is painting a diesel yacht green and saying it's now ... green. This is caring enough to change propulsion technologies. You might say it's excess, but that's a matter of opinion and perspective IMO. There are a lot of people who would argue with you that instead of electric cars we should just get rid of cars. Because to do otherwise is just showing off your excess. That more obviously doesn't fly because most people have way more familiarity with cars and see why they would want them compared to yachts. Where does this "we should just not produce this leisure thing" vs "we should improve the way we make and use this leisure thing to be better environmentally" end?

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well my first sentence explains that. Boats will never do enough mileage to offset the carbon in their production. Cars are utilities, we use them as tools. Most of us don't own cars for fun, they are a necessity. Superyachts are luxury toys. Why not convert existing yachts to electric? That would still be a better oprion that building new ones.

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There are people who will tell you your car is a luxury toy because you won't move to Manhattan where you don't need a car to live (or a European or Asian city.) I'm just saying one persons necessity is another persons luxury. But OK, how about game consoles - those don't need to be created - do you feel a great shame for having any toy that isn't necessary?

I just think - people will commission yachts. You won't stop them. Given that - is it better to build a new fossil fuel one or an electric one? Because that's the actual choice here.

[–] Starbuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The last part I think is crucial. These people are going to spend $10 million on a yacht. By getting them to invest in maritime electrics, hopefully we can support the industry to the point that they become viable for industrial uses, and that’s where it becomes interesting. A bunch of people who will never own a boat or work in maritime telling them that it’s useless is just dumb.

[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

For at least some people there's probably also an aspect of regulatory future proofing.