this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
163 points (88.6% liked)

Technology

58753 readers
5517 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A notice from X (formerly Twitter) stating: 'Block is changing soon. If your posts are set to public, accounts you have blocked will be able to view them, but they will not be able to engage. For more control over who can see your posts, you can still protect your account.' There is an 'OK' button at the bottom of the notice.

  • X is telling users that blocking will soon be useless and trolls and stalkers will soon be able to see their posts again.
  • Instead of blocking, X advises that users take their account private, the antithesis to what X and its progenitor Twitter was about.
  • This removal of blocking may violate Apple and Google’s policies regarding platforms that host user generated content.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So even after this update, the block feature on Twitter is still more effective than it is on Lemmy, yet nobody seems to be complaining about that.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 6 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Blocking on Lemmy does nothing else but hide that user's posts and messages from you

[–] caveman8000@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

What else do you want it to do?

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Hide you from the view of anyone you block. Essentially, when you block someone, they should automatically be forced to block you as well.

Block on Lemmy, and now Twitter, works like it used to on Reddit few years back, and the main criticism and massive issue with is that because it's just a mute/hide, you can't see what they post and they can keep commenting on your posts with whatever they want. It was huge issue on Reddit where assholes kept following users and commenting slander and falsehoods to every single post or comment they made.
Everyone else sees all of those comments as the first reply, but you are blissfully ignorant of them.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Me? Nothing. That's all I need it for.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Is...that not what's supposed to happen?

I don't have any other socials so I'm not too up on what the standards are.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Technically, it’s 'mute,' not 'block.' In most cases, blocking not only prevents you from seeing their content but also them from seeing yours.

What Twitter is being criticized for here is changing blocking to work similarly to how it does on Lemmy, with the exception that you still couldn’t engage with content from users who have blocked you, whereas on Lemmy, you can.

It’s being argued that 'weakening' the block feature in this way makes stalking and harassment easier.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 1 points 6 hours ago

Ah, so it's a mutual block but initiated from one side.

Thanks.

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I’m confused, what should it do instead?

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Hide the other user from seeing your posts as well is what they’re going for I think

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Oohhh, ok. That would be good.