this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
76 points (97.5% liked)

UK Politics

3087 readers
106 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why stop at online. The amount of pensioners and vulnerable people wasting their money on horses and fruit machines is pretty depressing.

On the one hand, I strongly believe in personal freedom (as long as you're only harming yourself) and if people want to spend their money, that way it should be up to them. On the other hand, some people are vulnerable and need to be protected from themselves.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

But they're spending their kids' inheritance. I can see the innocence in putting a few quid against your mates betting on horses. But capitalised rigged gambling is just immoral

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This. When only one side of the bet can lose. It is not gambling but rigged capitalism.

When an industry manages to remove all the risk from investment. While offering little to the society they inhabit.

High taxation to help return their cost to society. Seems a bare minimum charge.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

At least with the likes of a lottery the odds are obvious and "only one person winning each month", etc. A fruit machine programmed to only win once a month isn't.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But they're spending their kids' inheritance

How incredibly entitled can you be?

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think it's a fair point just not well made.

To paraphrase my first reply, to each their own, if someone truly enjoys gambling, they'll find a way to do it, legal or not.

However, there is a lot of good that money could be doing, whether it is used to help your kids or anything else like that, rather than it being hoovered up by fat cat CEOs and people that hold shares in gambling businesses.