this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
1039 points (96.5% liked)

Science Memes

10652 readers
4817 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

For the number of times women were straight up erased from their scientific achievements I think we can keep choosing them to represent the team for a bit.

[–] toasteecup@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'm fine with this.

As long as the team gets recognition in the more formal documents then let the media have whoever they'd like.

It's like doing set up for a show. Let the headliner be the focus but acknowledging the people who made it happen is really nice.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Definitely, I've not heard of any shenanigans with their paper. So they still get credit. It's just not a media headline.

[–] GottaKnowYourCHKN@lemmy.world 17 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

This. Men got so angry when this story dropped and took personal offense to the fact a woman did something important and valuable. The amount of times women have had their work stolen and taken credit for by some bro far outweighs the recognition.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Or maybe attribute everyone equally - regardless of gender / sex, since that doesn't matter to what they do? You don't fix injustice with more injustice by skipping the contributions of other teams and only singleing her out.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Science is teamwork, but the contribution of different team members is usually not all the same. There's no way for us to know who did most of the important work. We have to put trust in the team that they chose their representative fairly.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You replied to the person explaining this and ignored all of it - she was one out of 3 teams, each using different methods to arrive at the same conclusion. They simply made a photo of her when she got a result and was excited. They didn't "choose a representative". She said "everyone deserves the credit". So why are you pushing this, instead of saying "all the teams deserve credit and this is a cool photo"?

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

I do think the other teams deserve credit as well, just like her team does. I thought it was discussed whether it was right for her to represent her team.

Also, the fact that there were 3 teams doesn't mean we cannot celebrate the happiness of one of their leaders.