this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
273 points (97.9% liked)

3DPrinting

15595 readers
38 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I had new progressive lenses made, but the old ones are still fine and don’t have a scratch. They’re just a bit weak at near distance, but otherwise perfectly serviceable.

So I made new frames for them because I don’t like to throw away things that work.

All assembled, the frames weigh 3.5 grams, and 14 grams with the lenses mounted.

This was printed with a Prusa Mk4 and regular PLA at 0.15 mm layer height. The hinges use simple 10x1 pins - and I worked my magic to print the holes horizontally to the final dimension with interference fit, so no reaming or drilling is necessary. These glasses are straight out of the printer with zero rework.

I think they look pretty good as they are. If anybody notices they’re 3D-printed, I’ll say I’m gunning for that particular style 🙂

The front of the frames prints in 11 minutes and both temples in 12 minutes. I could break and make a new pair every day for the rest of my life and it would still be faster and cheaper than going to Specsavers only once.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

These are cool.

I wonder how these would do if you printed in ABS and then used acetone in a makeshift vapor chamber to smooth and somewhat anneal them?

I think, with them being smoother, they’d be somewhat more comfortable

Although PETG would probably last longer overall since it has some flex/give to it but not sure if there’s any process that lets you “smooth” it like you can with ABS.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Well I could do a lot of things, but one of my hobbies is to model stuff that prints out all ready to go as much as possible. This design uses small metal hinge pins only because printed-in-place functional hinges would be huge.

But otherwise I like that it's only 3 parts that print quick, don't require any rework, and still open up to accept the lenses, orient the lenses (I have astigmatism so my lenses need to be rotated exactly right, and if you look carefully on the inside of the hinge, the V groove is interrupted to match a notch in the lens' bevel, which also contributes to lock the rim closed) and everything holds together smartly with only those two pins.

So yeah, I could do extra work to make them look nicer, but I'm kind of proud to display how I managed to make them look straight out of the printer.

Not to mention, I'm lazy too 🙂

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

And you know what? That’s a great design philosophy.

Simple and repeatable. Besides you don’t want to risk more expensive lenses with more breakable parts (so the metal hinges make sense)

Lazy wouldn’t have made them so I’d call it efficient use of your time.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When you smooth you do give up some dimensional accuracy.

These days, I more or less exclusively print ASA and PETG. I would call the ASA tougher than PETG, but PETG's ability to stick to itself when printing makes me prefer it for thin parts. In my experience, PETG also allows for more elastic (temporary/recoverable) deformation before the part undergoes plastic (permanent) deformation.

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have a wall mount for some a pretty hefty stepping stool and it’s been going strong for a few years.

PETG really does handle that well while similar things I’ve printer in PLA broke even with layer line orientation and a lot of walls.

Good stuff.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I've had similar experiences. PLA is very stiff, which also makes it brittle. I have quite a few functional PETG that have been going strong for years. Now that I can print ASA too, some of my newer functional prints are transitioning materials.

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What about PCTG? Pretty much for anything that I’d need more strength than regular PETG I could go with PETG-CF or PCTG. The only thing that can force me to use ABS/ASA is the need for (more) temperature resistance.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I've never heard of PCTG before. A quick Google search and I'll probably be ordering a spool.

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can smooth PETG with Methylene Chloride, but I would not suggest handling things without proper training and knowledge first

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah. Even with acetone you want to be mindful. Nasty stuff and not to be played with lightly.

But interesting application if you can do it safely.

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes boss! And PLA can be smoothed using clorophorm. Another solution not to handle without safety training

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Try explaining that purchase.

It’s for smoothing out something I’m making. So it’ll look and act the way I want.

And the lotion? No officer, no lotion. Where would the lotion go?