United States | News & Politics

See, here's the problem: all you are doing is ignoring the wishes of another trans person.

This is what it means to not treat a demographic like a monolith. You have to actually develop correct positions and understand what solidarity means. You can't just go off of what a given person from a demographic tells you as if it is a representative gospel. This is a liberal tokenization of identity, it is by definition going to be inconsistent, and it is counterproductive because it is always used in bad faith to justify a violent status quo and present it as, "THE [demographic] position", and, as in your case, typically to attempt and pit the marginalized against each other.

It is common for naive white people to act this way and be easily taken in by tokenizing bullying logic, then repeat it themselves.

"My trans friend asked me to support a genocider" is not a valid excuse. You have simply adopted a false consciousness that works against solidarity, trying to let yourself off the hook for even thinking through this topic. Apparently I should be arguing with your trans friend because you are not responsible for your own opinions or actions, here.

If we want to go with the magical route of a single person can be representative of an entire group of people, then I'd be able to accept your request. However, we do not, and what I am saying is true that trans people will be harmed by me not supporting Kamala.

Trans people will also be harmed by supporting Kamala. Do you think there are no trans Palestinians? Do you see how your indoctrination leads you to pit marginalized groups against one another? Why can you not fight for trans liberation and against the genocide? Thousands, possibly even millions, do this every single day.

Not every single trans person cares about this issue as much as Palestine, which is fine, but there are at least some who do, so my stance is valid.

There is no logic to be found in those statements, though they are presented as if the conclusion follows from the earlier statement.

Hell, we can go further if you like: I could ask you to not let my Ukrainian friend be killed by Russia when the Republicans cut off support for it and the anti-air systems go offline.

Another good example of how far "my X friend said" will get you, or can even be counterproductive. Russia invaded Ukraine in response to decades of NATO (US)-based aggressions using Ukraine as a pawn. That was bipartisan actikn, though the most salient escalations happened under Democratic administrations. After Russia invaded, the Biden-Harris administration then fully committed to a strategy to hurt Russia regardless of how it damaged Ukraine and Ukrainians. They will gladly force escalations in a fight to the last Ukrainian. The people you are trying to support are responsible for the exact situation Ukraine is in, leveraging cynical, maximalist foreign policy regimes to ramp up tensions and push last red lines in order to hurt and take down other countries, not to support the people there.

Ending the war in Ukraine ASAP is the priority if you care about Ukrainians. Before they lose even more people and sell off even more of the country to foreign capital. If you think Trump will do this by no longer using Ukraine as a vehicle to throw weapons at Russia, you should, apparently, support Trump. Personally, I organize against both parties.

There are no shortages of tragedies in the world that have no easy immediate fixes

These are not natural disasters, they are geopolitical developments that have people and rationalrs and economic bases and interests. In this case the people you are openly supporting are doing a genocide. It is not something to "fix" as if they just happened upon a broken machine. They are active in its creation, they are its explicit material supporters in an ongoing genocide.

Notice that you cannot even describe who has blame. You adopt the passive voice just like they tell you to. Wouldn't want to actually criticize the genociders, right? That might cost them an election? This is you: "go team genocide!"

and sometimes simply reducing the damage is the only option;

Normalizing genocide and repeating tokenizing and absurd talking points from the party doing genocide is not reducing harm.

other times you can't do anything, and sometimes the lives of one side get weighed against the other. Shit sucks

You can always do something, but you would need to take that first step of doing anything at all in the right direction.