this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
538 points (93.8% liked)

Fediverse memes

199 readers
186 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse

founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Mind traveler is a troll who loves to start drama, ignore them

[–] match@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i have them usernoted as "is correct but unpopular", they are abrasive but usually also earnest and not a troll

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have yet to see them be anything but an argumentative troll. Especially when they're on blahaj

[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they are argumentative for sure, but they are arguing in good faith (and their opinion is bad or badly stated)

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

https://lemmy.ca/post/28392935

I can't say I've seen them argue in good faith. Usually goes like that after the person mind argues doesn't agree.

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

that post seems okay to me? just badly phrased with an unnecessary level of twists that impede understanding

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 days ago

Their comments are the real give away. And they're Already flooding here with them

https://lemmy.ca/comment/12117354

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Making a meme insinuating that hexbear, whose mod team is majority trans, wants trans people not to vote, kill themselves, and bomb the west bank, and then going after Ada for not going along with it is definitely trolling.

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

i suppose i didn't have that context because my instance isn't federated with hexbear

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ada defended a fictional transphobic troll by confusing them for a real trans person twice. In a row. She's confused. She can't tell fiction from reality when she logs into Lemmy, and she makes moderation decisions based on her misunderstandings.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Take a step back and ask yourself why you're jumping through all these hoops to call the admin of an explicitly trans instance and implying the users of the biggest instance run by trans people transphobic.

Like you have to understand on some level that transphobes don't spend years creating and aggressively maintaining a safe space for trans people.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ada has wonderful intentions. And she is incompetent, and Blahaj is not safe for trans people as a result. It looks safe for trans people, but when you look at the record of her actions as an admin, it falls apart. It's security theater. It's fake. She thinks it's really a safe space, and she's wrong. She's fooling herself and she's fooling a lot of trans people who are vulnerable because of her decisions. She deleted !soulism@lemmy.blahaj.zone, a trans community, because of her confusions.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It wasn't a trans community though. You also chased off how many trans people and trans comms?

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Soulism is inherently transgender as it deconstructs white supremacist reality including gender realism. When the reality of gender is destroyed, space opens up for an infinite diversity of subjective gender experience. Soulism is gender liberation with no limits. There is no soulist exclusionism. There is no soulist fakeclaiming. There is no soulist limit on what gender can be for the individual. And I chased off 0 trans users and 0 trans communities.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Right. You just started multiple witch hunts that lead to them leaving. Totally different

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't know who you're talking about because that never happened.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Find that hard to believe. Or just done it so many times you don't realize.

Give you a hint, starts with https://lemmy.ca/post/24092742

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I remember making that post, a lot of people agreed with me and also wanted the transphobic trolls gone. It's a shame Ada decided not to remove the community, and that they got a new mod team. Last I heard, posting was vibrant because the community trusted the new mods. I wish my warnings about their transphobia had been heeded.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If you honestly think that you are so much further gone mentally than anyone thought. Good luck with your delusions (especially calling a dead comm vibrant)

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They got new mods. Kitten was handling the community, giving them what they asked for, appointing mods who were posting and keeping activity up. Is that no longer the case?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes they got new ones because you chased off the new one. Now it's dead with no posting

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like the new mods weren't very good then. They expanded the mod team and the community still died?

I didn't chase anyone off of Lemmy, though. Link was a welcomed member of c/nonvoters and volunteered to take a hiatus. Kitten says so. What's the point in you ignoring Kitten when you claim to be an ally of that community?

Fundamentally I think that's what's at play here. The user base refused to trust Kitten and left. Your whole thing about loving the sub was a performance. You people were looking for an excuse to call the mods liars and leave.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like the new mods weren’t very good then. They expanded the mod team and the community still died?

And this is why everyone thinks you are a troll. Why would anyone stay at that point after those who actually had it going were forced out by those not in the comm.

Enjoy killing everything

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I already told you, I didn't drive anybody out. LOC decided to leave for his mental health, and you decided to take away his agency and devalue the words of his friend by inventing a conspiracy theory to get mad about. Why would LOC want to come back after seeing how poorly you treated him and his friend? He probably thinks you're a jerk and that the community was toxic for him.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wow. Amazing revisionism. Good luck with everything

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That level of trolling is art.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago

They're always the victim. So fucking tired of it lol

[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

my read of the situation is that there is some unstated person who, even though they are not literally named "obvious_troll", is similarly enough named that ada thought you were making an indirect attack on that person. again, i don't have the context to know who that would be but i am willing to believe you're all arguing at odds with each other.

(it is like if someone made a shitpost where the butt of the joke was MindGobbler@lemmy.ca)

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, there's no real person similar to Obvious_Troll. I made them up. Ada said in a private message that she didn't realise I made them up and she just assumed they were real. Then two months later, I said they didn't exist, and Ada got confused again. You're jumping through hoops to explain a person being completely mentally incompetent. This person you made up whose name is similar to Obvious_Troll, they don't exist. You're defending a fictional person you made up, just like Ada defended a fictional person I made up.

[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

what i said is reasonable given, again, the limited context of what i know

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think it is. You wanted a rational explanation for Ada's behaviour. And I understand that. I understand wanting to think the best of other people. But Ada's behaviour is not rational, and she hasn't earned the trust she has from her communities. We need to stop rationalising her behaviour and thinking the best of her. And that's what the point of that post I made was, and that's what her subsequent comments in the thread demonstrate. A lot of people on Blahaj are making excuses for her when they shouldn't.

[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

i havent ever thought about ada before this thread and can't evaluate whether she has uneaned trust. it seems like Blahaj is a cool place though (but again, my instance is not federated with a number of other common instances) and ada is the co-admin so i feel like i should have a reasonable amount of trust even if she may have failed in this, imo extremely nuanced, instance

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

Blahaj is a cool place despite Ada. Ada asked trans people to come, and a bunch of cool transes arrived. But Ada has consistently gotten in the way of that with bad takes, heavy handed moderation, and defending transphobes.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago

Oh, I know. That's why I asked.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seems like you were looking for trouble, and then you found it. Good job!

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We're not talking about me. We're talking about Flying Squid. Flying Squid calls people who don't agree with his religious views psychotic. Nobody else in the thread was as big an ass as he was. He thinks mental disorders are an insult for him to use against people who disagree with him. And he has a record of breaking the rules on various communities, even ones he's supposed to mod, in pursuit of his religious agenda. He chose to do that because he's a bad person.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

FS said:

I don’t know if you have psychosis, but you think reality isn’t real which is pretty much a basic definition of not being right in the head.

You're the one who decided you were being told you had psychosis, not him.

One of the things you said before the link you so "cleverly" excluded earlier context from was:

No, but most people do think of Reality as a god. But they don’t think He is a god. There’s an important distinction between thinking of one as something, and thinking one is something. One is conscious, the other is unconscious. People are perfectly capable of worshipping, praying to, and generally being religious towards someone they refuse to believe is a god.

And yeah, reading down that whole thread, you were the one being a belligerent ass, accusing people of things, and generally not making any sense. There's something not quite right with you, and medication could be part of a solution to that.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t know if you have psychosis

That's a lie. He said something he didn't believe to cover his ass when he realised he'd done something wrong. Since then, he's completely denied that that conversation even existed in the first place. He's lied even more once he thought he could get away with it. I disagreed with his religious views, and he said "Please take your meds." It's a joke, and the punchline is that I'm crazy because I disagree with him. He backtracked it, and said he doesn't know if I have psychosis, which is true, but he said it to support the lie that he never called me crazy. And as you can see in the other threads I linked, FS called me crazy because he thinks everyone who disagrees with his religious views is crazy. He broke the rules of his own community to say that people of other religions than his are suicidally deluded.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago

My previous comment stands.

[–] Soup@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I’d have done the same thing. It’s as plain as day what you were doing. Stop pretending to be a victim. You were the antagonist.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bold move, admitting to being so disrespectful of mental illnesses that you think they're your weapons.

[–] Soup@lemmy.cafe 4 points 6 days ago

What’s a bold move is trolling in such an obvious and public way.