this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
263 points (92.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43611 readers
1707 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hightrix@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Regarding capitalism, in reality, it is the best system we’ve seen so far.

Yes, theoretically other systems could be better for the general public. But in reality, they never have been.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Socialism has been proven to do far more for its citizens than Capitalism. Capitalism is just a phase in development, Socialism supercedes it.

[–] LemoineFairclough@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did something supercede Socialism in Russia around the years 1988 to 1991?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

It's important to note that the USSR didn't build into Capitalism, but collapsed into it. The USSR was dissolved from the top-down, not due to structural failures and instability, but due to opportunism.

There was a lot that went into the "murder" of the USSR, and numerous mistakes along the way of its development that were inevitable as history's first Socialist State, but the idea that Capitalism grew out of Socialism is not correct. When I say "supercede," I quite literally mean that Capitalism's mechanisms naturally lead to Socialism over time.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who told you that? Why do you believe it? Where and when are you citing as the best so far?

[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Life experience.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you want some salt with that boot?

[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

No, but do you have sriracha?

Please cite, with examples from reality, a better system.

[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Understood.

Please cite, with examples from reality, better systems.

[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

1940s American socialism. Which lead to the greatest income distribution for American families

[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Strong example!

I’m curious if we would call this time period socialism or capitalism being held in check.

The era of high taxes on high income was definitely beneficial to more Americans than today’s low tax structure.