this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
736 points (90.9% liked)

Technology

60103 readers
2184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 132 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I don't know how effective VPNs are over a public WiFi network, but I do know it stopped Spectrum from sending me "you are downloading copyrighted material, stop it" emails once I started using one. Fuck Spectrum, I don't have them anymore, but that seems like a good enough reason to keep using one in certain circumstances.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

On public WiFi I just vpn into my home network. The issue with public WiFi is that it can be sniffed by anyone in range since there is generally no encryption.

Although pretty much everything we do is over tls these days, and DoH helps protect against even dns sniffing. There's still at least some risk to working in the clear over a public WiFi network. At least in information gathering, what bank you use, etc.

But, there's no real benefit in using a paid vpn over one you own unless you're downloading illegal content, want to watch another Netflix region, or are in a country with heavy Internet monitoring/filtering.

[–] mint_tamas@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

With TLS and DoH, how is your bank and other information leaked?

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He said "which bank", which could be determined by the sniffing DNS requests, or seeing which IPs his computer is connecting to.

Not a breach of his personal information (assuming the bank that he's using and the client he's using after putting everything in TLS properly).

[–] mint_tamas@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

But with DoH you can’t sniff the DNS, that’s the whole point.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But you can see the ip address, which will id the bank. They can derive other information by ip addresses or leaked data and there's still things using unencrypted connections even today. I generally just connect to my home vpn so at least it's inly my isp spying on me.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Generally you can also read the SNI.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 1 points 2 months ago

I think this is one of the things that ech is meant to solve. But ech/esni is still not widespread on smaller sites yet I think.

[–] phillipp@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

You actually still can. Have a look at DNS fingerprinting

[–] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Possibly the domain is visible with a traffic monitoring tool. Everything else is between you and the bank via HTTPS. Having said that, whatever is not over https is visible to whoever sits on the same network as yourself.

[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 6 points 2 months ago

Importantly, you probably don’t know what all is encrypted in every app you use on your phone, so it’s best practice to encrypt the transport.

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I experienced the same with Cox Internet.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All ISPs are legally obligated to forward that shit to you. The alerts are not from spectrum, they're just relaying the information.

Right now, copyright owners do not have legal permission to find out who you are directly without a court order. They would only seek that information if they were planning to file a lawsuit.

Media companies know, from the Napster incident, that such actions can backfire stupendously. It's rare that they even bother anymore. I can go into detail on why, but I'll leave it out for brevity.

So they send the notice to your ISP, who is legally obligated to match the information on the notice to the subscriber and forward the notice to you.

For many, this goes to an ISP provided mailbox, which most people ignore the existence of it. Clearly spectrum operates differently.

The notices are from copyright holders who have no idea who you are, and can't determine that information unless they intend to sue you. So those can be, for the most part, ignored.

It's not your ISPs fault that you got those. They couldn't give a shit less about what you do on their service, or what you download. They just want you to pay your bill every month and keep the gravy train rolling.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm saying fuck Spectrum for other reasons. Either way, there's less of a trail.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough. I haven't used spectrum, so I have no opinion. I'm not in the right country to subscribe to their service, so there's that.

Have a good day.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Spectrum is a total shit ISP that does shady shit constantly, while being owned by a massive corporation run by a Trump supporter and unfortunately is the only option people have in a lot of places in the U.S.

Anyway, good talk. You have a good day too!