this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
1214 points (98.3% liked)

Political Memes

5601 readers
3495 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I have one "weird" and "radical" proposal: public housing to rent. Not to but. At affordable price. That would lower the price of every house, flat, ...

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Those who live in apartments, and only they, should collectively and equitably own the building entirely.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Put the squeeze on the landlord and then collectively make a low-ball offer.

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In the SF Bay Area, it costs over $1 million just to build one "affordable" housing unit.

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Good thing the fucking country is bigger than the SF bay area then, isn't it?

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's sold at that price. I'm sure it doesn't cost that much.

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That same article says it clear: the lion's share is the taxes part, not the house. If there was a public program, the taxes should be far lower. After all, that project wouldn't be a for profit one.

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No it doesn’t say that at all.

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

"While hard costs have surged during the pandemic, thanks to complications like diminished trade and supply chain issues, Alameldin said San Francisco has long been “practically infamous” for driving up soft costs with long, volatile planning debates."

That "practically infamous" means is not just a tiny part of the price.