Futurology

1739 readers

406 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

voidx@futurology.today

Lugh@futurology.today

Espiritdescali@futurology.today

AwesomeLowlander@futurology.today

Researchers develop a method to use DNA to store data, and demo its use by storing 11 MB in 3 micrograms of stable DNA dust. If scaled up this could mean 3.7 TB/gram of dust. (www.tju.edu.cn)

submitted 2 weeks ago by Lugh@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

In the future, you swab the inside of your cheek and then insert the swab into a port on your computer, which squeezes the swab to recover the cheek cells and then processes them. Congratulations, you have added 10TB of storage to your computer.

Further thought: downside - your data can be directly linked to you because it is encoded on your own DNA.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

you have added 10TB of storage to your computer.

Wouldn't that be more like "you have filled up 3 GB of storage on your computer". In order to create new storage space, your computer would have to be able to print new DNA, not just read existing DNA.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No no, the DNA is the storage media. You're not putting it in to collect your own DNA pattern, you're adding more DNA molecules that the computer can edit to encode data on.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

you're adding more DNA molecules that the computer can edit

Can the computer edit existing sequences on the fly? From what the article described, the DNA storage process sounded more akin to burning a CD or DVD which could be read later, but not modified.