this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
166 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37717 readers
463 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's not really a safe assumption to make. Even though they shared their methodology they don't seem to have shared the questions or the data. Misleading survey questions aren't uncommon.
I am saying he is reporting the data his company gives him correctly not that there aren't problems with the methodology. But even if there are issues with the methods here, Nintendo and Sony are reporting similar data as have previously done polls on the matter. And let's be completely honest here. They're most likely questioning the data because it doesn't agree with their anecdotal experiences talking to women. And this is likely because women are playing much different games than they are.
He's sharing data, that his company collected, but there remains the question of what the data exactly is. I mean, I don't think any of us were born yesterday, and we've seen 'science' and 'studies' in journalism and how they'll massage statistics and use vague terms to make specific claims. My favourite of this was years ago a study about cosmetics, which includes things like sun cream, was used to paint the narrative that all Korean men were walking around with make-up. While make-up was a subset of cosmetics, when you actually looked at it, it didn't really support the claims they were making in the articles about it. For the most part I rarely trust anything like this being shared unless I can have a look at the whole package.
There are real studies and real science behind all these stories, but the journalists and middle men can rarely be trusted to present them in an unbiased manner that can be verified.