this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
149 points (98.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5288 readers
939 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7
149
Just Stop Oil activists who glued themselves to Turner painting acquitted (www.theartnewspaper.com)
submitted 1 month ago by gytrash@feddit.uk to c/climate
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Two environmental activists who glued themselves to a J.M.W. Turner painting at Manchester Art Gallery in July 2022 were acquitted today in a Manchester court. The pair affixed themselves to the frame of Tomson’s Aeolian Harp (1809) by Turner and sprayed “No New Oil” and the Just Stop Oil logo on the floor with chalk...

... “The district judge found that the action was proportionate in view of the climate crisis,” a Just Stop Oil statement says. "By contrast Phoebe Plummer and Anna Holland received sentences of 24 months and 20 months respectively from Judge Hehir at Southwark Crown Court last week for throwing cans of soup on the glass cover of Van Gogh’s Sunflowers in 2022.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

While the soup attack caused damage in the historic frame if the picture, this protest did not cause any permanent damage. From the choice of glue to the choice of spraypaint, everything was well thought out. So no, I don't think this is proof that the Soutwark conviction is totally unreasonable

[–] abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us 13 points 1 month ago

Ah, good point. From https://slrpnk.net/post/13854087/11329905 I was under the impression that there was no actual damage. If that's wrong then the distinction you point out makes more sense and the conclusion you draw is reasonable.

That said, two years... for a frame. I know it's historical and all but two years seems extreme even for a historical frame.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The same judge (Southwark) thinks that damage to the eye socket of an off-duty police officer should get a suspended sentence.

But sure, when it's a picture frame, you have to send a message.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dude, it's not like frames grow on trees...

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, indeed. I myself am one of the many millions of people that visit the National Gallery each year to look at the frames.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

As Van Gogh wrote to Gauguin: I have hung the guest bedroom here in Arles with a series of frames that you simply have to come and see.

Of course, those frames aren't the ones on display. They're too valuable.