Excellent Reads

1490 readers

3 users here now

Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.

Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.

Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.

Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.

Rules:

Common Sense. Civility, etc.
Server rules.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Iliveonsaturdays@sh.itjust.works

awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com

AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works

This Place is Not a Place of Honor (www.damninteresting.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by Aatube@kbin.melroy.org to c/longreads@sh.itjust.works

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

An exploration into the biggest challenge to the proposed Yucca Nuclear Waste Repository: Warning future beings against treating it as an Indiana Jones film set.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

1&3: A nuclear repository needs to be sealed to prevent radiation. A chemical landfill does not. People can see the waste inside landfills from afar and realize that it's nothing of value.

I work in waste management, and every closed surface impoundment I see reminds me of an ancient burial mound. But my point is more that while our civilization is around, we need to manage those sites, so we will also be able to manage a nuclear site. This post-apocalypse site is useless while our civilization exists.

1b: There are parts of spent fuel that are completely spent and unreusable; in fact, reprocessed uranium costs way more than just dumping the spent fuel and buying new uranium.

True, now. Which is I said we'd need to find an economicslly viable method, but assuming we will never is unlikely.

2: You are assuming that the future beings will only discover and somehow manage to breach the place before recivilizing.

Absolutely not. Even prehistoric humans figured out not to live near the malaria pond, not to eat the wrong berries and which parts of the animal make you drop dead. And if they maintain civilization, all the warnings are useless anyway.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 week ago

Absolutely not. Even prehistoric humans figured out not to live near the malaria pond, not to eat the wrong berries and which parts of the animal make you drop dead. And if they maintain civilization, all the warnings are useless anyway.

First off, I'm not saying they'd maintain civilization; I'm talking about the case in which they lose a ton of civilization but manage to get to a state where they can quarry and break concrete before they rediscover radiation, as well as lose their language. Finally, by the time they figure it out, the nuclear radiation would have spread out a ton from the site. The ability to break does not imply the ability to construct.