this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
525 points (93.0% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
4014 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why recall them if the issue can be taken care of over the air? That IS what OTA stands for, right?

[–] abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Legally they have to "declare" a recall, even when they can fix it with a couple of lines of code and an OTA. Recall doesn't mean what you would expect it to me, it means "something the manufacturer needs to fix for safety reasons".

Hence why 98% of Tesla recalls are OTA (not actual stat, I'd have to look it up but it's definitely in the 90s)

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's just misleading then. Should really change that to match reality.

[–] Z4rK@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t know if it’s maybe a judicial thing or something or if they are technically required to do an official recall registered in some system, even if they can actually solve it OTA.

I would suspect the rules around required recalls are not really updated to reflect the extended amount of issues that a vertical system integrator like Tesla can solve OTA.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, it's one of those cases where de jure isn't the same reality as de facto and the hack journalist pretends otherwise? Gotcha.

I'm officially joining team "fuck Musk and his shoddily built rolling ipads, but that's bullshit bordering on journalistic malpractice", I guess 🤷

[–] Z4rK@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don’t have any agenda, I just tried answering your question.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not complaining about you, I appreciate your answer and am sorry about the confusion lol

I was complaining about the law and whomever made the statistics and wrote the article pretending that completely different things are the same, didn't mean to shoot the messenger!