this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
868 points (98.5% liked)

memes

9948 readers
3285 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Seraph@fedia.io 68 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Science is indistinguishable from magic, if you don't care to learn how science works.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

But... if there's a consistent system along which magic works which can be studied/researched/formulated, then isn't it just... science?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

nobody is convincing me assembly programming isnt magic

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Study a 6502. It's just electrons doing the only thing they can.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know about the best (because I started back in the 80s with a commodore 64, not exactly repeatable) but a good way is this guy: https://eater.net/6502

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Assembly isn't magic. Computers compiling/interpreting high-level languages into assembly, and making everything works without constantly breaking IS MAGIC

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

The keyword is consistent. Some settings have magic as inherently chaotic and difficult to control.

A good rule of thumb is that if a fantasy setting has a school for magic, it's probably a science. If it's knowledge passed from master to magically gifted student, it's probably not very consistent.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

magic works

Humans have yet to prove it.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Well, it sometimes does

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

Watch "Agatha all Along" - the series is managing to answer exactly this question with a great script and cast.

/s

[–] ByteOnBikes 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I absolutely feel like in a thousand years, we'll talk to a machine and not even know how it works.

Hell, I look at the computer in front of me and only feel like I know a fraction of what's going on.

[–] CheesyGordita@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Hail the Omnissiah!

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That's what neural networks are now. We do not know how it works under the hood. We just feed it training data.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

We know how it works, but we can't explain exactly how it got to the answers.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

We do, though.

Just to make sure my understanding was accurate, I asked Gemini to critique my explanation:

.

Unless it’s lying to me about itself, I was able to explain the basics of it in two relatively simple sentences. Of course that doesn’t cover everything, but Gemini thinks that’s a pretty good overview. After expanding on each point in its reply, it said this:

I think a lot of the confusion over these models stems from hype and marketing that makes them out to be more than what they are.

[–] Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu 2 points 2 weeks ago

Magnets, how do they work?