this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
146 points (90.1% liked)

Linux

48307 readers
668 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
146
The Dislike to Ubuntu (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago by Tekkip20@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml
135 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I know there are lots of people that do not like Ubuntu due to the controversies of Snaps, Canonicals head scratching decisions and their ditching of Unity.

However my experience using Ubuntu when I first used it wasn't that bad, sure the snaps could take a bit or two to boot up but that's a first time thing.

I've even put it on my younger brothers laptop for his school and college use as he just didn't like the updates from Windows taking away his work and so far he's been having a good time with using this distro.

I guess what I'm tryna say is that Ubuntu is kind of the "Windows" of the Linux world, yes it's decisions aren't always the best, but at least it has MUCH lenient requirements and no dumb features from Windows 11 especially forced auto updates.

What are your thoughts and experiences using Ubuntu? I get there is Mint and Fedora, but how common Ubuntu is used, it seemed like a good idea for my bros study work as a "non interfering" idea.

Your thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Debian can be annoying if you want to install a newish version of something from the package manager. It's why I can't use APT to keep Rust up to date and have to use Rustup instead, for an example.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can use distrobox with podman to get newer software. You also can use Flatpaks

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can also use a distro with more up to date packages. But not if you need Debian's stability of course.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The benefit of Debian is that it stays the same for a long time. It can be huge timesaver

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fantastic for servers

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While I don't disagree with you, I think it's a bit funny that you're bringing up hardships using apt to update software in Debian when the biggest complaint about Ubuntu is having to use snap instead of apt.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Oh I thought it was already implied that Ubuntu is shit lol

[–] pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

On Debian Testing or Unstable you don't have to worry about that as much. Right now, I have rustc 1.80.1 from the Testing repo, just one version behind.