Technology

59381 readers

3821 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

454

California will force companies to admit you don't own digital content (www.androidpolice.com)

submitted 1 month ago by dantheclamman@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (1 children)

tl;dr

California's new law will require digital storefronts to clarify that consumers are buying licenses, not outright ownership of digital goods.

The law forces companies to use distinct language when selling digital media to specify license terms to avoid false advertising fines.

The law goes into effect next yea, but won't apply to companies that offer “permanent offline downloads” of digital goods.

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

“permanent offline downloads”

How can anyone offer that?

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

(C )Any digital good that is advertised or offered to a person that the seller cannot revoke access to after the transaction, which includes making the digital good available at the time of purchase for permanent offline download to an external storage source to be used without a connection to the internet.

It shouldn't be that hard, gog.com manages to do it

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Oh I thought they meant having the content permanently available for download, which is impossible. Thanks for the clarification!

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That said, GOG releases is the most common kind on torrent trackers where there are any.

So - there is virtue to commercial concerns, but not in the way that assropes customers.

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They might be the most common because they're the easiest, but there are also still plenty of people actually paying for the games. I'll never be convinced that piracy is an actual threat to making money. Piracy has never been easier, just see /c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com for proof, and yet pretty much all forms of entertainmment are as profitable as ever.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

GoG
Itch.io
BandCamp
iTunes Music Store (it’s still around but can be hard to find because of Apple Music streaming service)
Amazon’s music store (but it’s crap quality and they put audio watermarks in it - don’t use them while the two above options exist)
Comixology before Amazon bought and deleted them
Occasionally there are websites where you can purchase video content for download, but it’s quite rare. I remember buying anime from such a site before.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Google play music used to offer it as well.