this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
10 points (100.0% liked)

AskBeehaw

2003 readers
1 users here now

An open-ended community for asking and answering various questions! Permissive of asks, AMAs, and OOTLs (out-of-the-loop) alike.

In the absence of flairs, questions requesting more thought-out answers can be marked by putting [SERIOUS] in the title.

Subcommunity of Chat

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
thrawn21@beehaw.org
UngodlyAudrey@beehaw.org
10
Would you consider retro a specific era or a line that moves as time goes on? (beehaw.org)
submitted 1 month ago by Gamers_mate@beehaw.org to c/askbeehaw@beehaw.org
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

For example people consider ps2 retro but I always considered retro being in the 80s and earlier. No right or wrong answers it was just something I was curious about.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think it's several different things

  1. a visual design aesthetic
  2. specific gameplay mechanics
  3. "legacy" systems and software

I think each of them can differ in whether they're fixed or not. Generally I think that in game design, retro is fairly anchored when it comes to visual aesthetics and gameplay design. "Boomer shooter" mechanics and visuals, pixel art games, etc. I suspect we'll still see those 'retro' games in 20 years, and probably not see e.g. Ubisoft-style open world control-point-capture games being called retro.

Consoles though, I do think shift into retro status very consistently. I think there are people who would even consider DS or certainly GBA games as retro already.