this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
364 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59168 readers
3377 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

bro who the fuck is google paying to do cloud compute for them? Google cloud??

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I assume they've come up with some generic cost if someone was training each model using cloud compute.

Eeit: below comments confirm this, from the source.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

god i love accounting, it's so much fun.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But this isn't accounting, this is just the way the study calculated stuff.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lets make our model sound cooler by paying high rates to ourselves!

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Man you and the other dude are trying way too hard to be outraged about something that doesn't exist here.

This isn't data that Google, etc claimed. The srudy is attempting to represent what they believe the financial coat to train these models would have been.