politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
There is a solution. Tax ultramillionaires and billionaires and corporations at 1950's 93% rate, fully fund comprehensive health, no co-payment, no deductible, including at least annual preventative visits.
We very specifically need single-payer universal healthcare. One of the biggies issues with healthcare is the sheer number of different insurers. Knock it down to just Medicare and give it to literally everyone. Period.
Yes, and fully funded is also key, because Medicare rates are ridiculously low.
It's appalling how much we have to alter treatment plans based on Medicare rates. If someone doesn't have a supplement plan, they probably won't be able to afford the new medications that are MASSIVE improvements on the old ones. It's so frustrating to have to try to cobble together a treatment regimen for congestive heart failure or type 2 diabetes without being able to use the new medications because Medicare doesn't cover enough of the cost for the patient to be able to afford it. It also affects how long a patient can be hospitalized and figuring out the requirements to make sure they qualify for rehab after hospitalization is aneurysm-inducing.
Yes. It's frustrating for everyone involved except those who profit from such s a convoluted system. I'm sure handing a terminally ill patient a Medicare waiver is absolutely heart-wrenching. When I worked ICU hall in the nursing home, back when two CNAs were actually required per fifty patients, and worked in teams, I can't tell you how many were quickly burned out from being disheartened by having five minutes or less to dress immobile patients, or from having to restrain patients to keep them from scratching shingles outbreaks, or being unable to find a nurse available to suction patients with death-rattle.
I just finished my second family medicine rotation and it's just so ass-backwards because if we could give them the medication they need, they won't end up in hospitals/ICUs/long term care facilities/etc. The new medications are incredible drugs and can vastly improve the quality and quantity of life for patients with diseases like diabetes, heart failure, renal failure, and more...if the patients can afford them, which they frequently cannot.
How are we supposed to extract what's left of their value unless they're in said facilities?
Typing that out made me throw up in my mouth a bit.
Well, JD Vance thinks grandma and grandpa should be the solution to childcare, but that only works if they aren't actively dying and need to be cared for themselves. I'm pretty sure the GOP also thinks that daughters-in-law and granddaughters should be doing the elder care for free as well, so I don't really know how they expect that all to work.
(It's not supposed to work. People are supposed to make rich people richer and then die, according to the GOP)
Oh so you've got a double dose of burnout, from overwork and trying to navigate the system. I'm sorry. What general region are you in? Wondering if we can somehow work together on getting universal passed?
I'm a third year medical student in the Midwest. I'm aiming to do my residency in Minnesota, either Emergency Med or Family Med because apparently I like doing social work and hate my sanity or something.
We're not near, and you're going to be quite overworked and under-rested, for quite some while. Trial by fire. Also plenty of data that can be used for arguing for a better system, should you decide to engage in moving that mountain, at some point. Wishing you all the best, and thanking you for taking valuable time to converse with me.
It's still good to know there's other folks out there with a good head on their shoulders that are working towards a common goal. :)
Yes it is. May I humbly recommend getting to know grant writers asap and well? Wishing you all the best in your endeavors; we need more medgremlins in our world.
Once I'm in residency, I will become very well acquainted with grant writers and social workers.
You don’t really even need to fund single payer healthcare. The U.S. spends twice as much on healthcare as other developed countries already. You just have to nationalize the insurance companies, which can cost as much as you’d like. There a no law of physics preventing it.
You still have to allocate the money.
It's already allocated to healthcare, that's the point. Instead of paying a huge insurance premium to a useless middleman you pay the government a medium tax amount.
If we changed nothing else at all besides who actually gets what you already pay it would still be significantly cheaper. If your insurance provider gets nationalized you could even cut a check to the same entity you do now.
No, those fraudster are how we got into this Mrs anyway. They can be taxed back down to regular wealth, their exorbitant extra homes sold, and we can use that money to pay for nice things for the whole public, like addressing causes of despair, correcting infrastructure, providing quality education for everyone, cleaning up pollution, food, farming, rehabilitation for offenders of all sorts, and everything else we sold ourselves for that we didn't get properly done because we slept on ourselves.
Increasing taxes will just end up going to wasteful or corrupt things, like the weapons manufacture industry. It's not the solution the left is looking for. Need more regulation on government spending first. Then see if you need more tax income.
Oh we can do both at once.