this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
619 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59197 readers
2518 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rob200@lemmy.autism.place 163 points 1 month ago (35 children)

How can we go back? We're already on the way back. It's called the Fediverse.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 50 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I help pay for my instance to operate, and it's a cost I'm happy to help shoulder.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 16 points 1 month ago

Us instance admins appreciate it I promise

[–] michael@lemmy.chrisco.me 5 points 1 month ago

Same, its on my best pi. 🥧

[–] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How is it running you a month?

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago

Are you asking how much I donate per month?

[–] Banichan@dormi.zone 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ehhhh, the OG internet connected better because all nodes were well connected. The Fediverse is a series of single servers that can't even sync all data across themselves. It's cute, but it's post-it notes on strings atm

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

I wonder if there’s a more efficient way to have things sync in blocks or something. I honestly understand very little about server architecture, much less decentralized social network architecture. Maybe having a smaller number of “centralized” (community-run, redundant, independent) nodes distributing blocks of federated data to take load off the actual instance servers that would only need to upload bulk data to fewer places?

Maybe this isn’t very different from how it already operates. Fuck if I know.

[–] michael@lemmy.chrisco.me 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep we have different lemmy/mastodon/etc.... instances talking with one another. Anyone can set up something like activityhub. Its a fun place in my opinion!

[–] gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Btw how do we stand on just blatantly copying and reposting material from reddit? I missed the announcement talking about that.

[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

enjoy the mainstream memes and discussion, but avoid the algorithmic content slop from them. That's how I see the fediverse. It's a win in my book.

[–] Yaztromo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The Fediverse is a bit more like the old USENET days in some regards, but ultimately if it ever becomes more popular the same assholes that ruin other online experiences will also wind up here.

What made the Internet more exciting 30 years ago was that it was mostly comprised of the well educated and dedicated hobbyists, who had it in their best interest to generally keep things decent. We didn’t have the uber-lock-in of a handful of massive companies running everything.

It’s all Eternal September. There’s no going back at this point — any new medium that becomes popular will attract the same forces making the current Internet worse.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exactly.

I'm interested in distributed applications (think BitTorrent, not ActivityPub), and my primary concern here is filtering. I want to be able to only see content from people I trust and people they trust (and so on), and if I do that well, I won't have to see a ton of crap. That's how regular relationships work, and I'd like to try my hand at it with anonymous relationships. Think something like Web of Trust, but adjusted for larger networks of people.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That sounds awesome and I'd love to use it.

Same. Unfortunately, it's nowhere near done yet. 😅

[–] Rob200@lemmy.autism.place 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Fediverse by design prevents this, while the internet of the old age had little if any guardrails against this specially since the platforms never really federated with another.

Did forum sites even federate? One forum sites would be dead and the next would have more activity. But what if the other forum with less activity was the one you wanted to use? The old internet was a good start but there's a reason why it's dominated by Instagram and Facebook, while email, you can use mostly any provider and not feel like you're left out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

No. The fediverse is just more of the same mindless gargling and regurgitation of mainstream media excrement that the internet has become, but federated.

It lacks the creativity, originality, experimentation, wonder, sheer life of the old internet.

It's just as dead, enshittified, and riddled with misinformation bots as everything else.

[–] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

Step up!

Create!

[–] warmBoots@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago

And here I thought I was being elitist as a new member. I wonder what IRC is like these days. Discord is still cool with just certain friends in a server.

[–] Rob200@lemmy.autism.place 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Whatever cool stuff someone posted on a forum 10-15 years ago can be found on the Fediverse, possibly even in better quality because people know how the internet works overall more then they did back then and we're not all still using Windows XP. Now if you're talking about the era of flash games, you shouldd try html5 games.

On the Fediverse you have the desk client, and web clients. If the fediverse isn't creative you wouldn't have a Misskey next to Maastodon which is it's own thing all together not just another fork of Mastodon.

Can y make these claims make sense to me based on this logic I provided here.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

My reading is that it’s not necessarily a problem with the platforms but society at large.

One example you mentioned: yes, html5 games (and just downloadable itch/steam games) exist and they fill the gap left by Flash games from a gameplay perspective maybe.

But the mainstream appeal of Flash games and animations was different to what we have now. The social phenomenon of people randomly hacking together terrible flash games isn’t the same as the current tiny indie game phenomenon. I feel like the old ones were a bigger piece of the average person’s internet usage than the new one (the average person’s internet usage being 5% LLM 5% web 5% email 25% gaming 30% video and 30% doomscrolling or something like that idk)

I’m struggling to put into words what I mean by this, my comment sounds really vague when I reread it. The specific creative outlet that Flash gave people is not equivalent to what we have now, and the specific entertainment experience of browsing and playing Flash games is different from the experience of scrolling through itch. Am I making more sense?

Like of course the different technologies are different, but it’s where it fits into our lives that it’s really different imo. Hell, we could say this about Flash itself for the last few years before it was discontinued. Just the two thoughts of Newgrounds in 2006 vs Newgrounds in 2016 and how they fit into the internet ecosystem and internet culture are enough to see the difference.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The fediverse is just a barnacle on the larger Internet at this point. It has to become more - we need to make our own web

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

We need a faster safer quantum proof forward secret timing attack proof version of tor

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not unless you are operating your own instance.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)