this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
102 points (99.0% liked)

Games

31803 readers
1485 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

After 2 INK-credible years of Splatoon 3, regular updates will come to a close. Don't worry! Splatoween, Frosty Fest, Spring Fest, and Summer Nights will continue with some returning themes!

Updates for weapon adjustments will be released as needed.

Big Run, Eggstra Work, and Monthly Challenges will continue for the time being.

Also they just released a video celebrating each splat-fest: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cd3qYJRnI7E

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I've still never played a splatoon game, mostly because I don't wanna have to re-purchase it after a couple years

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are you imagining that this game should be like those constantly updating online games that rely on micro transactions or monthly subscription? It was a game to buy full price, but got updates and events for free for 2 years plus DLCs. The servers and game will still be online getting quality of life and security updates. Splatoon 1 servers were online for 9 years... On Wii U no less.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It does rely on a subscription though.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As do nearly all console online games

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think that's a great excuse.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe it isn't, but it's hardly a reason to single out this game for it.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think it's singling it out to say that the just-about-required subscription makes it less appealing to purchase, whereas most multiplayer games have the PC version as an option.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I didn't know we were playing the PC vs console argument. Nevermind, someone did that in another thread already. Yes PC without subscription is better. But anyone playing anything on a console buys the sequel every few years of whatever the game may be. Which was what I was replying to

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

We weren't per se. Only that a predominantly multiplayer game is a harder sell when the subscription is damn near mandatory, which is why there are so few multiplayer-only games on consoles that cost money up front anymore, and free to play games get an exception to the subscription service on PlayStation and Xbox.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

S2 was 2017, S3 was 2022. Five year gap is pretty reasonable for sequels.

S4 likely won't happen until after the next Animal Crossing, since it's the same team working on both IPs.

[–] Renacles@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My issue with that is that Splatoon basically dies off for a few years until a sequel comes out. I'm not playing for switch online for a game that won't get any new content.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How many years do you expect them to keep pumping out content for the same game? They've gotta wrap it up somewhere. Two years is plenty.

Back in my day, games were released and we played them for what they were.

[–] Renacles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I would be happy with that if Nintendo didn't charge a yearly fee for online.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago

The second game was around for well over two years.

Needing to buy an online subscription is a far better complaint than a misinformed timeline.

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I still have yet to understand what is new in Splatoon 3. I play 2 casually, just for a few pvp matches every so often, and it's good as is

[–] missingno@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago

It's an iterative series, each game building on the predecessor's mechanics, so there's not any one major twist. But there are a lot of little things that add up. The new movement techniques are great, Salmon Run has been significantly expanded, and just in general the QoL is night and day.

Also, the fact that Ink Armor, Sting Ray, and Main Power Up are not in the game might be the true biggest step forward. S3's meta is in a pretty good spot now.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The second game even repurposed large parts of the not-particularly-impressive campaign of the first game. They weren't going to fool me again by making me buy the same game a third time.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago

Large parts? It's been a while since I played Octo Canyon, but I'm pretty sure the only thing that reappeared from Valley was the Octostomp boss, but it's a different fight anyway so not really.

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 6 points 3 days ago

You can keep playing it tho?