linuxmemes

21197 readers

224 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

LemmyMemes: Memes
LemmyShitpost: Anything and everything goes.
RISA: Star Trek memes and shitposts

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html

2. Be civil

Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.

Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.

Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.

Bigotry will not be tolerated.

These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.

3. Post Linux-related content

Including Unix and BSD.

Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.

No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.

4. No recent reposts

Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

poopsmith@lemmy.world

zephyr@lemmy.world

rtxn@lemmy.world

447

I like both, but usually prefer Ubuntu (slrpnk.net)

submitted 1 month ago by tsugu to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world

168 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AnimalsDream 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But you're also promoting Ubuntu's continued use, when Snaps are just one example of Canonical being antithetical to free software values. Mint is all the benefits of Ubuntu without that garbage, so why not that?

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've tried mint. Its more trouble than ubuntu.

[–] AnimalsDream 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mint is literally a slightly modified Ubuntu.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, what is your point? Ubuntu is literally a modified version of Debian. Of course Debian wasn't created from any other distro. First time I tried it was in 96. The point I'm making is that there is a certain effete push away from the established status quo but there isn't any real need for it.

[+] tsugu -8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

when Snaps are just one example of Canonical being antithetical to free software values

No they are not. They are just another way of packaging apps that is specific to Ubuntu (and distros that can run Snap). The format has its flaws but calling it antithetical makes no sense.

Also, I like Snaps. Ubuntu comes with Snap pre-installed. So I won't be using Mint.

[–] AnimalsDream 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is the Snap backend available and open-source? If not, then it's antithetical to software freedom because Canonical is trying to close their users into a walled garden in the ways that Apple and Google are with their app stores.

There are plenty of software packaging systems that work just as well or better than Snap, and promote software freedom (Flatpak, Appimage, or even just traditional package managers). By using and promoting Snap over these, you are working against the growth of digital rights.