this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
1780 points (97.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

5837 readers
1618 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 125 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Insurance is, at its core, a reasonable halfway measure towards public control of a critical resource. If you need something only very rarely, but it's something that needs to exist ALL THE TIME just in case, insurance allows you to pool your resources with other people in the same boat and afford to keep an industry around just in case. Somebody will always be using it right now, and it'll be there when you need it, because you paid into the pool.

The problem is, as always, the insertion of capitalism into the solution. If someone has to profit from this set of relationships, the motivation to provide the resource is in competition with the motivation to extract more profit. This is what happened to healthcare.

Insurance is only a halfway measure because we already have an organization capable of managing common resources that individuals use only rarely but which the public needs all the time: that organization is the government, or the governments at various levels. We manage lots of things this way: fixing roads, stopping houses from burning down, pulling people out of floodwaters, that kind of thing. You don't need it all the time, but it's there when you need it because you're paying taxes to a government that has no profit motive from it. Insurance should only ever have existed temporarily while government infrastructure was debated and organized, but the for-profit industry managed to capture enough of the government to keep itself alive indefinitely.

In short, insurance isn't inherently bad, just not meant to be a permanent fix. Capitalism is bad.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Private insurance should only exist for things that are both a) completely optional, and b) not inevitable (so... evitable?).

Auto insurance? Well, if it's the law to have it, why is a private company involved whose sole model is to collect money and deny payments?

Health insurance? Well, it's optional, but you will absolutely need to pay for Healthcare at some point (or you die early). Why, again, should we put an institution in charge whose sole purpose is to make the average person pay more than they get out of it?

Famous athlete leg insurance? High value possession insurance? Have at it, private insurance.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Auto insurance being mandatory makes sense in that the wronged person shouldn't have their life destroyed because someone can't drive and afford to replace a car.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They didn't say auto insurance shouldn't be mandatory, they said that it shouldn't be privately run

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

A pedestrian can be involved in a car crash too.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Tonight, on Saying That Last Little Bit that John Oliver Can’t Say…