this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

Football (Soccer fútbol fußball 足球 )

5680 readers
16 users here now

Here for discussion of all things association football/soccer!

Rules

Other Football/Soccer Related Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
MushroomMan89@lemmy.world
skipseagull@lemmy.world
FootballBot@lemmy.world
ReadyUser31@lemmy.world
UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
FootballAutoMod@lemmy.world
9
[Discussion] Change My View (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 2 months ago by Blaze@sopuli.xyz to c/football@lemmy.world
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Post an opinion and see if anyone can change it.

Let's give this a try!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

  1. VAR has the potential to make the game much better. The refs' interpretations of the subjective rules are the issue. The whole rulebook needs to be rewritten with the aim to eliminate grey areas.

  2. Offside lines should be drawn from the back foot of the attacker. It was designed to stop goalhanging, not to penalise attackers who gain no advantage from being a centimetre offside.

  3. This one I'm not even sure I agree with but here goes... Headers should be banned because repeated knocks to the head are not good. In exchange, anything above the sleeves of the shirt should not be classed as handball.

[–] ReadyUser31@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Totally agree about the offside rule. It's so boring when attacking play is ruined on a technicality based on a three pixel attacking advantage. Totally misses the point.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

  1. Agree on 1. Another big issue is the VAR refs being from the same organization as the on-field refs. That leads to buddies not wanting to hurt each others' feelings.

  2. I like this but would extend it to being the rear-most foot of the attacker that is on the ground and the front-most foot of the defender that is on the ground. Making it about feet only and not all attacking-eligible body parts, while also making it about what is actually touching the ground, makes it sooooooo much more easily measured by VAR. No more drawing vertical lines from shoulders to connect to a horizontal line from the ground, just two lines that are easily seen by cameras and the existing lines on the field.

  3. As it is right now, anything above the sleeves is already not classed as handball. Maybe headers are only allowed inside the box?

[–] OlPatchy2Eyes 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
  1. I'm afraid of this creating complicated offsides calls brought about by a defender standing still with legs spread and then simply lifting the rear foot to trap attackers. It's a funny image but probably valid for set pieces.
[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Hmmm, solid point.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

  1. Yeah good shout, I just know certain fans/pundits don't like complicated rules so tried to keep it simple but your method is better.

  2. Sorry, I think I was unclear... Above the end of the sleeve meaning on the sleeve is fine. I don't think that's the current rule as I've seen many recent decisions when they've given handball for the ball hitting the sleeve. If that's not the case, I refer back to #1.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago
  1. You're right. Commentators have been saying for years it was the bottom of the sleeve, but the actual rule says bottom of the armpit. That's close to the bottom of the sleeve, depending on the length of the sleeve, but not technically the rule.
[–] OlPatchy2Eyes 1 points 2 months ago
  1. Refs should have the power to consider the context of the game when enforcing or not enforcing the rules. I agree that there are areas of the rulebook that ought to be more objective, and I agree that the refs are too often failing to be fair in their decision making, but a completely objective rulebook with no grey areas would mean players' professionalism would have to be so much higher than is reasonable to expect, especially of younger players. In other words the ref should be able to verbally warn a player who is being a dumbass, and then card them for a similar offense if they don't stop.