this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
169 points (98.8% liked)

Linux Gaming

15493 readers
23 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Got this from a post on the alien site. From previous discussion on Lemmy it sounded like Linux users had good things to say about this game but were discouraged about the upcoming FaceIt implementation such that they wouldn't be able to join anticheat enabled matches. Those users and Linux gamers on the fence would probably appreciate hearing this news.

With this announcement on the dev team's community Discord, it appears Linux users will NOT lose access to matches with anticheat.

Source: https://discord.com/channels/303681520202285057/345616096470237186/1129780379218358282
(BattleBit Remastered official Discord server)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] M_Reimer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (7 children)

"Popular version of Linux"? I smell really bad things. They could lock this down to just one distribution.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

If they officially support one distro, how difficult would it be to get working on any other distro? Most of my steam library was never supposed to run on Linux, but that doesn't stop valve.

[–] M_Reimer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Maybe they target one of those "immutable" distributions to be able to bring invasive anti cheat to Linux. Meaning the same spyware as they develop for Windows based on a closed source, signed, kernel module.

[–] nani8ot@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That won't work since Valve doesn't want to bake such software into SteamOS.

My guess is that they'll use FaceIt AC as a server side component to detect cheaters.

[–] M_Reimer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I hope so. A user mode unprivileged software part on the client would be OK, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)