this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
427 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3834 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In policy proposals posted to her website, Harris called for an increase in the overall minimum wage and for the end of the subminimum wage for tipped workers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A full sweep. I don't know if it's possible this election (i.e. who is running) but the numbers need to change to enable progress.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

The game is tough for Democrats, I don't think this gets nearly enough attention, but pretty much they have to win all the close races, and flip a couple more. Current Projections show 48(D+I)/2(Tossup)/50(R).

The longshot potential flips are:

  • everyone's favorite real human Ted Cruz of Texas by Collin Allred
  • Rick Scott of Florida by Debbie Mucarsel-Powell

About 20%, 30% chance according to TheHill. A lot of work will be needed to unseat those GOP powerhouses.

Democratic held seats that have various likelihood to flip to Republican are:

  • Jon Tester of Montana to Tim Sheehy,
  • Elissa Slotkin of Michigan to Mike Rogers,
  • Jacky Rosen of Nevada to Sam Brown,
  • Bob Casey of Pennsylvania to Dave McCormick,
  • Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin to Eric Hovde, and
  • Sherrod Brown of Ohio to Bernie Moreno.

A lot more work will also be needed to keep all these seats. And young people are going to have to look to the bigger picture, show up in droves if they want to prove any poll wrong.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Definitely a real possibility, but tight in the senate

The senate is likely to come down to: can Dems either maintain John Tester in Montana or flip Florida or Texas

There's also the funky possibility that Dan Osborn wins as an independent in Nebraska and overturns a deep red seat. Limited polls put him neck and neck. There's no dem in that race and Osborn has distanced himself from all parties. He said he'd likely try not to caucus with anyone, but if it didn't work out he'd caucus with whoever aligns better with his goals. He's very pro-union (he lead Kellog's strike in 2021), pro-right to repair, pro-legal weed, against corporate ballouts, against a national abortion ban, but appears a bit more conservative on immigration, so make of that what you will