this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
947 points (98.4% liked)

Political Memes

5611 readers
1724 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] j_overgrens@feddit.nl 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I take great offense in you saying that tankies and socdems infight, lol. (I mean, I get it, they are both statists, but I feel on a emotional level most socdems feel more for anarchism than for leninism.)

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I would be an anarchist if I weren't socdem. The problem with anarchism is that it only works on a very small scale, where people know each other well enough to work on mutual understanding. That wouldn't work on a very large scale due to people having their own ideas. I was told before that anarchism is basically the norm for most of human history and thus it could be implemented. Well, look around, aren't we already living in anarchism under the nation-state model? Even though there is the United Nations, most of their power is non-binding and could easily be ignored by a more powerful member. And thus we are already living in anarchism; and it's not working as idealised.

[–] Crismus@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I'm more anarchistic in personal beliefs but am willing to embrace social democrats to get some benefit.

The idea of the greatest social good for the largest group is more important than trusting everyone to follow the correct policies when given power. I also personally think that state power is incompatible with anarchist beliefs.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

anarchism isn't the lack of rules. Nor is it many little kingdoms.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Well if meant to in the context of the occasional big tent movements. I don't think most socdems think much about anarchists at all except when it comes time to scold us for not voting.

[–] j_overgrens@feddit.nl 6 points 3 months ago

Yes, and I think that when together in a big tent, socdems would associate more easily with anarchists than with leninists. Especially with syndicalists, for example.

[–] snekmuffin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Was under the impression that most anarchists are aware that voting is still important. like it or not, we are still citizens of some state for the time being, but we can use that to promote useful change or to exercise damage control, as part of the overall praxis arsenal. especially with some organization within your local groups, it can be a good tool.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How does one then answer the question “If you think elections don’t work, then why do you participate?” by a non-anarchist?

You've made plenty of good points throughout the article about the problems with the system. I don't see why that can't be your answer. There's no contradiction in acknowledging major problems and still exerting what little influence you do have.

But if they “work a little” for an anarchist, certainly they would work a lot for a non-anarchist.

How does that logic follow? Assuming you both have the same values and are trying to achieve the same thing, then a solution that works for one person will work just as well for another. The difference in opinions is on which solution will work, not on what you're trying to achieve.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago

There’s no contradiction in acknowledging major problems and still exerting what little influence you do have.

I just disagree this is any sort of influence instead of a palliative.

How does that logic follow? Assuming you both have the same values and are trying to achieve the same thing, then a solution that works for one person will work just as well for another.

You are quoting a rhetorical question. The point I'm making here is that if someone isn't an anarchist and therefore doesn't do direct action, then seeing even anarchists take part in elections, reinforces to them the idea that elections work well enough.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This post borders on sovcit levels of delusion.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 months ago

well what's important is that you get to feel smugly superior.