this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
57 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37598 readers
205 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That makes it safe from third party middle man attack, not from the therapist.
Also I am reasonably sure you can hide a camera in the room in face to face session.
Hiding a camera in person would be actively malicious if the other party doesn't know. Having a zoom recording leaked is less actively.
Hitting the record button is quite active though.
Sure, I get your point and agree.
I just think that third party middleman attacks should be mitigated wherever possible and so far, in looking at online therapy I've never seen one that can back up their claims of being private with data, just vague references to how secure it is.
It's a tricky situation, and I guess there's no good solution because either we have to trust the third party or just the therapist and if neither can be trusted, well...
it just speaks to a larger issue with society as a whole, how we treat mental health and especially that we need to pay in order to deal with our issues, and that it hasn't been understood yet that it's shameful and scary to come forward about problems because of certain laws, and the possibility of either the original scenario or the one you proposed.