Games

16690 readers

291 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

Concord servers are now offline. Thank you again to all the Freegunners who have joined us in the Concord galaxy. (x.com)

submitted 2 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm not convinced this game's development cycle wasn't all just a giant money laundering operation. There's no way they could spend that much time and that much money only to put out something so universally panned, and not be intentional. All those millions of dollars, and they never hired a single consultant that looked at the project and said "Literally nobody wants this"? I don't believe it.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't think anybody actually hated the game, it just was very mid, and for the space it was competing in it wasn't compelling. But it wasn't obviously bad

So if you're a consultant looking at one aspect of the game, it's hard to make the prediction the entire market would reject it.

It's really down to the game directors, and the leadership, and the executives. They didn't have a product that was sufficiently unique to make a name for itself, and they should have known that

[–] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

You have to take in money for laundering to work. This is just money hemorrhaging. They fucked up royally, I think largely by not advertising. No one even heard of it until news of the poor release numbers made headlines, and that sure didnt entice purchases.