New York Times gift articles

547 readers

195 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Only post New York Times gift article links.

Info:

The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
“Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.

Tip:

Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

baltakatei@sopuli.xyz

A Democracy With Everything but a Choice | A new analysis of American elections finds that in half of all races for partisan offices, a candidate runs unopposed. Democrats are the biggest no-shows. (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 2 months ago by silence7 to c/nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

TL;DR; gerrymandering means that there are a lot of races where the best a Democrat could do is 35% or so of the vote. The same often goes for white rural areas where the boundaries weren't gerrymandered, but are simply non-competitive. Democrats don't even bother running a candidate a lot of the time under those conditions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] silence7 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The donation form for the Harris Victory Fund literally describes how the funds you contribute are divided between the Harris campaign, the DNC, and the state parties.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

And they said it back in 2016 too...

But guess what actually happened?

Hint:

The answer is in the link you didn't read.

Extra hint because you won't go read it:

They fucking lied.

You want to actually prove something?

Since you say two elections is too far back, go find how much money BVF took saying it would go to state parties, then how much money they actually got and at what point during the election.

You won't find it, because like I said, they're private organizations with no responsibility to disclose.

You're asking me to just assume they stopped doing shady shit as soon as people stopped being able to see their book, I think that's incredibly naive