this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
322 points (99.4% liked)

Games

32368 readers
1235 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Damage@feddit.it 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I wonder why they didn't make it free-to-play and try to cash in on microtransactions

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's presumably why it's going offline and everyone getting refunds

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

With all the negative press, I doubt they would try that. Even if it goes free, people will recognise the name and wouldn't bother trying it.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago

I think the people that have never heard of it far outweigh the people that have and decided to ignore it. They're chasing "normal" people, not people like us who would likely have ignored it even if it was a free to play, micro transaction riddled mess.

And "FREE!" does appear to be a key factor in making this kind of game take off. They live or die by initial player interest and retention.

These things are expensive to make, it's not just going in the bin. I'm just not sure where it belongs. It's clearly Overwatch's stunt double, and even that seems like it's on the wane.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

It's a non zero amount of work, and there's every chance they spend more money making that change than they would bring in.