this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
84 points (63.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36109 readers
1155 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ok, the title was an overuse of emojis as a joke. But seriously, I like some limited use of emojis because it helps me convey intention/emotion so that I'm less misunderstood and also adds some more feeling/fun to text content ๐Ÿ˜„

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Imagine if every language in the world used the exact same alphabet, exact same words with the exact same spelling, and exact same sentences but the meaning of those words/sentences varied from person to person, region to region, in different contexts, and sometimes changed day to day. Then on top of that, the words even rendered differently from device to device.

Additionally, there was no way to look up what those words meant to the person writing them, who you don't even know. Even if you ask for clarification, there's less than 50% chance they'll respond at all, let alone provide a sincere, meaningful, and accurate answer.

That's what emojis are like to me. Sure, some of these same complaints apply to text-based communication as well, but emojis take it to the extreme.

I don't typically care that much if people use them -- for instance, to reinforce the meaning or intention of their message. But it's mildly annoying when the emojis are a message all of their own and that person is trying to communicate with me.

Additionally, there's an extremely high degree of correlation between people and messages that use a bunch of emojis and actual quality of the message/meaning being sent. In other words, if someone's using a lot of emojis to communicate, I can pretty much completely disregard anything they have to say because it almost certainly holds no value to me. And that's okay.

So maybe in a broader sense, comments/titles/descriptions with lots and lots of emojis is annoying similar to seeing advertisements at the top of my search results and interspersed in the front page posts. It's useless drivel that mucks up the experience.

And even to use your description as an example:

I don't understand at all how that emoji is necessary or even insightful. It seems completely contradictory to the "But seriously" at the start of the sentence, it doesn't seem like anybody with any degree of reading comprehension would mistake what you're saying as being something negative/nasty/mean/hurtful/etc so it's like if I ended my sentence with "and I'm currently chewing gum". Okay, nice to know I guess, but why would I need to be told that?

[โ€“] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

well yeah if the person writes ๐Ÿ˜ช๐Ÿ˜”๐Ÿคฅ it's not clear what they mean, but this poster gave an example sentence that's pretty unambiguous, and is using the emoji as a tool to make it even more unambiguous, are they not? ๐Ÿค”

Just feels unfair to lump ๐Ÿ—จ๐Ÿ’ฃ๐Ÿ’จ๐Ÿคณ style emoji usage with "let me put ๐Ÿ˜† to make it more clear this is a joke" ๐Ÿฅบ (also sometimes it's just what the writer is feeling, rather than trying to be clear communication)

[โ€“] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Perhaps. I'm not chewing gum anymore right now.

[โ€“] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The point of the emoji at the end was to "add some more feeling/fun to text content," like if I ended a comment with "I couldn't stop smiling while writing this." It's irrelevant but it changes the flavor of the text.

Besides that, many lemmy users are on the spectrum and will read "Donald Trump is known for his great border policies" in a comment that it's clear they're joking, and they will still have -5 score and comments arguing with them until the poster says "it was a joke." Compare that to "Donald Trump is known for his great border policies ๐Ÿคก" or ๐Ÿ™„ or ๐Ÿ’€ depending on how obvious you want to be. It's just a tool that can be misused or annoying like anything else.

[โ€“] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This actually is a good point and is one of the reasons that overuse of emojis can be annoying for some folks. Basically it boils down to the fact that a lot of people using them don't use them effectively or in a way that provides any "value" to the reader.

For an otherwise clear and benign statement, a grinning emoji to signify that the writer wants their statement to be "fun" isn't particularly useful, relevant, nor insightful for the reader. At best, it comes across as unnecessary filler like an ad at the end of a sentence. It makes no difference, it's just there for the writer's own pleasure. Nothing wrong with that, but hopefully you can see that it would be annoying for some folks.

On the other hand, using emojis effectively, like putting one after making a sarcastic statement provides insight and meaning to people reading. In other words, it has value for the audience, provides useful context. A lot less annoying to people when they actually derive some benefit from it.

One issue is, a whole lot of people don't recognize this and/or don't care.

[โ€“] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah I think it's just some people are not trying to "communicate" rather they're just doing it because it's fun for them (and some others). Sort of the "talking because they like to talk." I used to also be pretty annoyed by it but I had a friend use them all the time and sort of just got used to it. Even if it did still annoy me I don't like to ruin someone's fun, so I'll just be a bit mad and carry on (and then complain to other people it annoys)

[โ€“] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I am sorry ๐Ÿ˜”๐Ÿ™ but with all respect to you and Jose I consider match not played โŒโ˜๏ธ๐Ÿ˜ because yoo many (stock)fishy things happening! ๐ŸŸ๐Ÿคจ๐Ÿคข๐Ÿ›œ Long night watching video recording ๐ŸŒƒ๐Ÿฅฑ๐Ÿ“ฝ๏ธwill check why timer and chesscom clock showing such a considerable difference in lenght of the games ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป๐Ÿ“๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ, will let everyone know ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿซ๐Ÿ˜ฌ

[โ€“] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah but those jeans ๐Ÿ˜ณ

Yeah but those jeans ๐Ÿ˜

Yeah but those jeans ๐Ÿ˜

Yeah but those jeans ๐Ÿคฎ

[โ€“] MadBob@feddit.nl 3 points 3 months ago

there was no way to look up what those words meant to the person writing them

https://emojipedia.org/