this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
1433 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59038 readers
4357 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ads upon ads upon ads

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alivrah@lemmy.world 132 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A single row of ads would be ok, but having this many plus an ad showing up first, where the search results should be... Oof

[–] Sheltac@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No it wouldn’t. Phones aren’t cheap.

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They can be. I bought a Galaxy s22 with a broken screen for $150, and my carrier just gave me an $1100 credit for it on a new iphone. I don't need an iPhone, and I will be selling it to get yet another cheap phone and pocketing the money, but it goes to show just how much phones do not cost to the people producing them

[–] Anomalous_Llama@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Dam that’s a hilarious life hack lol.

I’m on a 12 Pro with no intentions of upgrading but when I go to I’m gonna try and find a new broken flagship to turn in too lmao.

[–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Android licence is free and the Play Store infrastructure has to support tens of millions of devices.

I'm not saying this is an acceptable level, but Samsung ain't putting a dollar toward Google running the store, in fact, they'd much prefer to run and maintain their own.

[–] redcalcium@c.calciumlabs.com 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's not true. Phone manufacturers need to pay if they want to include Google Play in their devices, it's not free. It can cost as much as $40 per device.

[–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the correction, I was unaware

[–] Sheltac@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I guess hoovering up all your data ain’t enough.

I don't even get why having the store on more devices is supposed to "cost" google anything.

It's a store. They get a cut from every transaction. Why wouldn't they want it to be on everything?

[–] sunglocto@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

They shouldn't rely on ads to make money back on a phone IMHO.

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I don't think ads showing something related to what I'm looking for are bad in and if themselves. I want to find related content, the problem is that these are often not in any way related to what I'm looking for. It's just a list of who paid to be listed there.