this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
955 points (100.0% liked)

196

16449 readers
1823 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] don@lemm.ee 91 points 2 months ago (3 children)

A two micrometer thick layer of water would evaporate nearly instantaneously, I’d think.

[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 72 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Without surface tension, water would evaporate much faster in general. Probably could set out a cup of water in the morning and it would be gone by bedtime.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 56 points 2 months ago

Nestlé liked this comment

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Your own body would basically be a fog cloud of evaporation all day until you were dehydrated like a skeleton in a salt flat, which is exactly what you would be, since no life anywhere could exist.

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago

Especially if there were weaker intermolecular forces (which normally give it surface tension).

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You could even mop it up by placing the mop in the middle of the room and just wait.

[–] hakase@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If there were no surface tension there would almost definitely be no wicking action either. If it didn't evaporate super quickly, water without surface tension would probably be a giant pain in the ass to clean up.

[–] anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Surface tension and surface energy are related but different. The surface energy of the interface between water and air causes surface tension. The surface energy of the interface between water and mop fibers causes wicking.