Microblog Memes

5833 readers

1763 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
Be nice.
No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

ReadyUser31@lemmy.world

aeronmelon@lemmy.world

808

Are they a thief of focus or simply very efficient entertainment? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I lean toward "efficient entertainment", but I do sometimes wonder what that chunk of my free time would look like otherwise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It is not clear that the Voynich Manuscript is a hoax/fantasy book. The plant illustrations, whilst ambiguous, do look like plausible real plants (though some have features of multiple species), and while nobody has decoded the text, the letter and word frequencies are consistent with it being natural language rather than gibberish.

Perhaps you’re thinking of the Codex Seraphinianus?

[–] AnActOfCreation@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Hey I just wanted to say, thank you for sending me down the rabbit hole of both of these texts. Fascinating!

Regarding the Voynich Manuscript, and to be fair to the person you're responding to, with no current decipherment, there is a good possibility it's a hoax.

Churchill acknowledges the possibility that the manuscript is either a synthetic forgotten language (as advanced by Friedman), or else a forgery, as the preeminent theory. However, he concludes that, if the manuscript is a genuine creation, mental illness or delusion seems to have affected the author.

Also the Codex Seraphinianus is much newer and self-admittedly describes an imaginary world in an imaginary language.

Anyway, thanks again for the Wikipedia adventure. :D