this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
114 points (82.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35868 readers
2910 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Author Joel Williamson shared Elvis kept a group of three 14-year-old girls with him on the tour who were up "for pillow fights, tickling, kissing and cuddling when he was 22.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 30 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Paedophilia seemed weirdly acceptable right up until around 2000 or so. It's really quite surreal how commonplace it was.

[–] psion1369@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I won't say acceptable, as there were still issues and such, but it was definitely persecuted differently.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago

Amateur. In the 70s they admitted it in song.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Plus it was easier to cover up back then.

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Uh… no. Baby raping has always been frowned upon as far as I’m concerned. 14 year old consensual (to the extent a 14 year old can be) groupies were a thing, in the not too distant past, but social mores have changed since then. Which is good. There’s an enormous difference between the two though.

[–] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think you may be wrong. Wikipedia tells me that:

"In 1880, the ages of consent were set at 10 or 12 in most states, with the exception of Delaware where it was 7."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_the_United_States

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Delaware is whack, but historically age 12-15 was a reasonable (for the time) age for girls to marry. Most biblical scholars say that Mary (JC’s mother) was about 15/16 when she popped him out (assuming there is some historical fact in the story) so those ages in your country weren’t completely crazy outliers. People grew up quicker back then because people died sooner back then. Just getting to the age of 12 was an accomplishment in its self. The past was a different place. If humanity makes it a few more generations then some of the things we accept and do now will be seen as unacceptable. We are all products, to a greater or lesser degree, of the time we live in and that shapes how we see the world as it is and as it has been.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think it was that people weren't seen as victims. They weren't seen as helpless

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Absolutely. The optics of the past don’t match-up with the optics of the present.