this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
662 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59340 readers
5287 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
662
Procreate takes a stand against generative AI, vows to never incorporate the tech into its products | TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)
submitted 2 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
94 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Popular iPad design app Procreate is coming out against generative AI, and has vowed never to introduce generative AI features into its products. The company said on its website that although machine learning is a “compelling technology with a lot of merit,” the current path that generative AI is on is wrong for its platform. 

Procreate goes on to say that it’s not chasing a technology that is a threat to human creativity, even though this may make the company “seem at risk of being left behind.”

Procreate CEO James Cuda released an even stronger statement against the technology in a video posted to X on Monday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why do you think it ingests all its content from. Problem isn't the AI itself it's the companies that operated but it's not inaccurate to conflate the two things.

I think you'll be in a little disingenuous.

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I like how you completely dodge his argument with this. If training data isn't considered transformative, then it's copyright infringement, like piracy.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes I agree it's copyright violation I think maybe you're not reading my comment correctly? I'm responding to the guy saying that it isn't copyright violation.

What are you talking about? Did you understand the original comment?

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Your initial claim was that MLMs "steal" content to train on, which is plainly false. If MLM training data is theft, then piracy is theft. All this hate should be directed at the legal system that punishes individuals for piracy while enabling corporations to do the same.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 2 months ago

You need to take some pills or something because you're swinging from two positions at the same time. You have a go at me because you think I'm saying copyright violation is acceptable and now you're having to go at me because I corrected you and said I think it's unacceptable.

Please decide what you actually think before commenting