this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
541 points (95.6% liked)

Comic Strips

12478 readers
3865 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't oppose AI pictures at all. However, considering that all generative image models have been trained on human generated data, it is only fair that these models and art created by them be under copyleft licenses.

[–] Just_Pizza_Crust@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

In the US under federal law only a human being may own copyright over a piece of artwork. Even a monkey that takes its own picture can't legally own the picture, so neither can an AI. The only thing you can own is the access to the artwork.

[–] abrake@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Honest question: how does this work for corporations? Does that mean a particular employee of a corporation holds the copyright, or can the corporation itself (e.g. Disney) as a legal "person" hold a copyright?

[–] Just_Pizza_Crust@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Nobody can hold the copyright unless it's deemed to be created by a human. Disney owns the copyright because under US law, corporations are also people, and their employees create the work for Disney.