this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
774 points (98.0% liked)

Science Memes

10356 readers
2511 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 143 points 1 month ago (22 children)

I suspect that if you add up all the money Youtubers make, and you divide it by all of the man hours people spent trying to make a living off of Youtube, "poverty stricken PhD candidate" would start to seem like a good financial decision.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 84 points 1 month ago (17 children)

Yeah becoming popular enough on YouTube to be able to have it be your full time job is like winning the lottery in terms of how many people have tried vs how many have succeeded.

[–] emenl@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It seems to rise to the top of YouTube, you have to be a crazed sociopath or just plain idiotic to engage enough people to be able to afford a house. I think college is overrated but still think those that try are better off. Youtubers are not in anyway contributing to the betterment of our world. It's sad how crap content is the driving force for getting monetized.

[–] srestegosaurio@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

College is overrated? How so?

I think it does depend on the degree but at least here it leaves you with a far better prospect.

[–] emenl@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Looking at my friends kids who have completed college in the last ten years, I can safely say that 70% of them are worst off than if they didn't go. How did I come to that conclusion? Well they are so riddled with debt it's going to take them at least 10 years, if not more to dig themselves out of that due to the college experience. Are they more educated? I would say yes but their outlook on life is so grim compared to the other kids who didn't go to college and jumped directly working into trades. Those kids I see are happier and doing better in life. Again, this is just from my experiences. True it all depends on the degrees and the person itself but still doesn't change my opinion on thinking college is overrated now.

[–] srestegosaurio@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

That sucks a lot. As I mentioned on another reply here it's not needer to take any debt in order to go to college. I forgot about how it works on other places, mb.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They went into debt for a lot of fucking experience.

[–] emenl@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

No I would like to disagree, they went to college for the opportunity to gain more knowledge. Some of them partied, some of them are idiots but in the end college itself doesn't give you experience needed to guarantee it being worthwhile like it used to be 20 years ago. I say this as a guy who got a BS in electrical engineering and no one wanted to hire me out of school since I had no experience except for the college experience of in itself.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah if you’re getting a science degree I think that helps.

If you’re getting a degree in something like french renaissance literature or basket weaving, you’ll probably have a harder time.

[–] srestegosaurio@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

Oh, totally agree.

Humanities are treated like shit by our materialist society. It's engineering or being a teacher.

Also, I'm not from the USA so I don't need to get into perpetual dept to study which might be something yo consider.

[–] SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sadly, the sociopath/idiotic formula does seem to resonate with the algorithms and/or the public. There is a local creator that I know to be a thoughtful, well-rounded person, yet they had to reduce themselves to a cartoon caricature in order to get traction. But that approach seems to have worked out for them, at least initially through Tik Tok and YouTube. Now I see them taking on increasingly sketchy sponsorships as their 15 minutes fades. And of course audience capture indisputably steers media makers into conspiratorial niches they can't escape without sacrificing views/payout. Authenticity be damned.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

It's kinda ironic, but the best creators I've come across seem to be ones that aren't in it for the money.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think this says more about the dross you watch than anything else. Surely you're not going to argue that someone like Tom Scott, Project Farm, or Torque Test Channel don't add something of value to the world?

[–] emenl@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No I'm subscribed to Tom Scott and Project Farm in fact! Unfortunately I feel useful stuff like that is in the minority on YouTube. Try looking at the top videos on a guest account. That's all the crap I'm referring to. A lot of mindless drivel

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Sure, but that's the case with any type of entertainment. Half of any bestsellers list is either smut, or something like Jack Reacher novels. The Office is one of the most watched TV series ever, and it's hardly high brow entertainment.

[–] suction@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Because houses are waaaay to expensive now.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)