this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
1082 points (96.6% liked)
Atheism
1989 readers
1 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You can't have a serious discussion with a person who follows a millennia old book
Studied*
Lol spelling errors aren't a great way to try and play smart
Oh, and that's what the other side is pursuing - a serious discussion?
Spare us. The other side is out for blood. No discussion is detailed in Project 2025.
Yes.
Is US politics not related to this post? I mean, in any way?
Then why did you do it?
Ironic. 🤣🖕🏽
If we swap the word "bible" for "lawbook" does your opinion change?
If we had it all active laws in one book, that would be a huge step in the right direction.
Agreed. "Ignorance of the law is not an excuse" is currently impossible to correct.